Its benchmarking.
The prior generations had to
• be as good as men to get jobs
• be the same as men to keep jobs
That is reflected in the pregnancy and maternity the US has. Leave to recover from producing the next generation is unpaid.
The social fund women pay into fails to provide for a financial need that only women will have.
Having babies is "bad" because someone (women) have to grow them someone (mainly women) has to raise them until they become (hopefully) productive members of the community. The community dont want to share the cost and see the woman as not being a productive member of the community as it is not a "job" just something which any(onlywoman)one can do.
This real biological difference is clearly not being the same as a man. Men can get an education and a job and a career and sex without having to worry about growing and raising babies.
What is "stunning and brave" about a man removing himself from the social class man to the social class woman. Is it when you class women as less? So its not a hero being brave for winning is it?
Men have a clear physical advantage so in sports women are not as good as men nor are women the same as men.
Women are in the paid workforce and use birth control so its a choice between a male type career path or a female type career path.
In sports women dont even have that choice. They are not going to (or highly unlikely to) end up winning gold at 30 weeks.
A male body has a physical advantage.
So the next generations of women need to work out how to manage and value the stuff that men can not do in a way which uplifts women. To make the benchmark become woman focused by recognising that women are not men.
These women are determined to keep the benchmark as man.