So, they think the party leader’s actions should be indemnified. Ok, but it wasn’t. And because it wasn’t, they now will pony up to prevent him from the impact of his actions. It is obvious it is not to give justice to MD. Does that mean anything he does? Anything at all, even if found in a court to have been a defamer. What else, or is there no line to what a party leader could do and be bailed out? They’re doing this to save him from bankruptcy, and to prevent a by election. This should not be the conversation as he should have to resign. Dodgy f%ck being rescued and assisted by other dodgy f%cks. IMO.
JP was shown to have not acted in a reasonable way. He personally engineered things so as to misrepresent MD, and stitch her up without a fair hearing or chance to defend herself against his scurrilous, defamatory accusations. The party should be booting him out.
You usually can’t collect house insurance if you commit arson. Even if the insurance pays out to a third party, they’d hound the person who was responsible for wrongdoing for the full costs. Maybe charges. It wouldn’t be mammy and daddy giving you terms which save you from bankruptcy and not having to face the consequences..