KJK supports Trump

[NefertitiV]

After the Trump verdict today, KJK retweeted three supportive tweets to her timeline, including one from US ex-Fox host Megyn Kelly that says "Guilty on all counts. The country is disgraced. Alvin Bragg should be disbarred. They will rue the day they released this lawfare to corrupt a presidential election."

Another tweet makes fun of President Biden's stutter.

This is someone currently up for election herself. Given her recent remarks about barring rentals to all trans people, and the fact she has received funding from US conservative political groups, does this concern you?

If you don't want people to read your posts, don't write them.

And I'm reading about what you have written, not what you haven't.

Is there a problem with the word 'fascination'? FGS. I meant academic interest, but you know that.

@Datun

Well, you might want to consider how the 'fascination' with women's reaction to you slagging off another woman comes across as a 'motivation' on the feminist board!

Sorry, does the fact that she's a woman mean that she can do absolutely anything? She's also in the political sphere now.

And I wasn't slagging her off.

Oh give over.

You ignore the purpose of this board, writing reams slagging off KJK instead, out of academic interest.

I hate to tell you this, but that is not an improvement on fascination.

I think you should leave @NefertitiV alone, @Datun . I like her posts and you don’t. Why don’t you check out other threads and leave us in peace to discuss the actual point?

You can use any excuse you like. No one buys it.

I’m happy to read @Datun posts on this thread

She doesn’t have to leave

What do you mean ‘no one buys it’? @Datun how on earth would you know whether everyone buys it or not?
i find the op’s posts fascinating 😁😁

Of course she doesn’t have to leave @EasternStandard 🙄 I’m not a bouncer. It was an opinion.

Nobody needs to leave the thread just because you don’t like their posts, MNHQ aren’t keen on posters being asked to leave threads

its good to have different opinions…otherwise it would be one of those hive mind thingys that no one likes

nefertiti seems an articulate and capable poster and i am sure she can manage to only of respond to the posts she wants to

Crossed post!!

thats cos i keep having to check the spelling of nefertiti

I'm with @Datun. I'm not buying it either. Honestly it's not difficult to get the measure of the OP even with name changes as they have a very unique style of writing.

There we go, a live demonstration of 'not a hive mind'.

😇😃

As was my post

To counter yours. Of course she doesn’t have to leave

But I didn’t say she had to leave @EasternStandard . Stop saying that I did. I gave an opinion. I didn’t give an order.

This

@MyOleMan what you posted is pretty clear

Why don’t you check out other threads and leave us in peace to discuss the actual point?

Where’s the slagging off? As oppose to ‘describing things she’s done and said’

The president role in the USA has long been a circus. It's an odd thing that 300 odd million people need one leader. A human peculiarity that we insist on a pyramid with one man at the top.

Hideous president behaviour is not new. JFK was appalling with women, there's stories of his time in office about how his handlers would search out and bring women to his hotel room for sex on a daily basis.

It's a defunct idea but humans hang on to it and many people are invested in the competitive war over which man is to be their "king".

I often wonder if we will ever grow out of it, but until we do we will be observing this ugly human circus.

Anyone who thinks this place is some sort of 'hive mind' should start a thread about beetroot.

Right @EasternStandard , I should have actually said ‘please stop derailing the thread’. I stand corrected. Can you get over it now? I fear you will now derail the thread.

It’s not derailing to challenge the OP on their genuine intention of the thread.

I'm questioning the OP's own words that they are fascinated and have an academic interest in women's reaction to their posts about KJK.

It wasn't until page 19 that someone even showed the tweets ( that KJK didn't write). And I guess we'll run out of room before anyone finds one good word she's said about Trump. And yet... we've had screeds of posts asserting she's a Trump fan. Presumably all based on the same bedrock of evidence as the OP.

I would agree the board is for GC purity spiralling.

You appear to be suggesting OP leaves for stating a different opinion. There is a concerted effort to shut down the thread and drive away any posters that aren't toeing the board line.

Meanwhile no actual engagement on the consistency of a woman claiming to be all about women's sex based rights being a supporter of one of the highest profile misogynists there is.

It comes across very "shoot the messenger".

People start threads or post on threads when they have things to discuss. I scroll through gazillions of threads I don't post on, either because other posters are saying what I would or I'm learning and have nothing to contribute.

You can't really project someone's interests from the threads they've started.

If one is interested in KJK and how she operates, what that says about politics generally about the rising influence of the American right in the English speaking world (I am too) this is the only place you stand half a chance of finding other posters to discuss it with.