JKR reprimanded by "feminist" "ally" for being unhelpful (to him).

[TinselAngel]

Be kind, ladies or Debbie will tell you off like one of his pupils.

archive.ph/2024.05.13-070326/www.spectator.co.uk/article/jk-rowling-is-playing-with-fire/

Ha snap Tinsel

We've seen this before. All these men who identify as women who see their own self-serving criteria as THE thing that really counts.

Debbie just sees it as the fact that he says 'yeah, I'm a man, but you know, you can use male pronouns, but I'd rather you didn't', fucking bollocks. And guess what, that makes me just like you gender critical women!

He''s identical to the Lucy Clarks. Just a whole shed load more manipulative.

And now - people are seeing it.

I noticed DH did not use pronouns for or name Lucy Clark, it was always "this person" or "that person". A way to be granted forgiveness from both camps, I wonder?

He needs to stop the forced teaming with women and realise he is just a man who gets off on dressing up, just like "that person", Lucy.

Well spotted.

There's nothing like a ferociously gender critical ally who does the opposite of what they advocate for, is there!!

What on earth must he think the difference is?

Fuck knows.

And yes, he's like every other tra. Those who aren't in prison say yeah prisons should be single sex. Those who aren't into sport say yeah sport should be single sex. Those who don't need a rape refuge say yeah those should be single sex.

Or - you should be able to access on the basis of surgery, or passing, or how long you've been identifying as a woman, or a piece of paper.

Each and every one of them has their own specific criteria.

Hayton's is, that despite being a fetishist who wanks off to the idea of female stereotypes, considers himself an ally of women 😄

And that's enough apparently!!

DH sees himself as a beautiful woman while seeing LC as an embarrassing example of a man dressed as a woman.

And vice versa!!

Has he got cataracts?

I enjoyed reading this (you'll laugh, you'll cry) in the Critic

https://thecritic.co.uk/jk-rowling-does-it-again/

Although <confession> I misread the author's name as 'Nick'. I'm sure she'll forgive me. Deadnaming tweets 😃 but a cracking, angry summary.

Thanks, Cakey that was excellent!

Excellent article.

It is an excellent article, funny and cogent, where we are and how we got here. And Hayton? Nary a mention which is how it should be. I don't trust Hayton to be entirely honest about Hayton-self, so I rarely read Hayton's output. I wouldn't have bothered with this one except for the JKR mention, which was probably the point. Using women for attention.

I love Nicky’s turn of phrase: 'if you sustained a “mind bruise on your thought place” by reading words written online', and referring to Twitter as the deadname of X 😂

Yes, I too approve of not referencing Hayton in her article - remove the oxygen of publicity from a tutting man 👍

She did that one very well. Thanks Nicky.

I love Nicky’s turn of phrase: 'if you sustained a “mind bruise on your thought place” by reading words written online', and referring to Twitter as the deadname of X

Cracking lines, a wonderous take down.

Debbie Hayton is a creepy fetishist. I won’t support the invasion of single sex spaces by anyone, however I feel terrible sorrow for the traumatised, vulnerable and lesbian/gay young people who have bought into the delusion that they can change their sex. I have no sympathy for a man with a fetish talking down to women and pushing his own agenda. No one publicly engaging in their sexual fetish should be around children either.

I’m as liberal as they come - as long as you aren’t hurting anyone then do whatever you want in private with other consenting adults, but don’t inflict it on children or society at large.