Do you have any evidence for this belief of yours, or is it purely based on opinion rather than evidence?
It's pretty obvious to anyone other than her followers that she's a grifter. She makes a loud noise but actually delivers little in terms of real change.
There is a difference between raising money through merch to support a cause, and milking a cause for personal profit. KJK followers refuse to see the difference. I've had arguments with women in real life who say that KJK is "allowed to do what she wants with her money" and that those who donate are all perfectly happy with her using their money to pay off her mortgage or pay for luxury hotels and business class flights. But I don't think that's true. I think lots of people who donate to her / sign up for her memberships or whatever think their money is going towards making a difference and so they're being fleeced. You have an ethical responsibility as to what you use donated money for, that's different to personal money you earn as wages.
Activism is NOT getting a bunch of working class women / women with not a lot of money to pay off your mortgage for your very nice house and then bragging about it.
I suppose it also depends how effective you think KJK is being. She makes a lot of noise but I don't think she's doing that much to actually create change.
I'd like you to explain why you think that KJK is responsible for "pitting activists within that movement against each other". She has been excluded by other activists for years, starting with WPUK in about 2018. You are attributing a lot of power to her if you think she is solely responsible for all the disagreements between different groups fighting against transgender ideology.
Please take some time to look at the language she uses. KJK is a classic mean girl / playground bully. WPUK rescinded an offer for KJK to speak at one of their events after they realised her politics didn't align with theirs as she's happy to cosy up to the far right (my words not theirs) - that time it was Tommy Robinson plus comments she mad - but there has been a catalogue of far right associations since. WPUK publised a very carefully written words to explain this, and then said NOTHING for many years (choosing to break their silence briefly a little while back, I forget why now).
KJK in the meantime went on the attack, creating the narrative about "head girls", purity spirals etc etc and trying to goad left wing feminists into a response. Like any other narcissist (and I think her narcissism is the root of the problem) shewcouldn't let it drop. The way she treated them, and the schism she actively cultivated is down to her. It wasn't two sided as it was her keeping the rift alive.
It's also not a purity spiral to not want to work with racists, or anyone who's happy to work with them, and KJK is.
KJK loves contraversy, indeed she makes money out of it - the more outraged she is, the more she stirs up bad feeling, the more money comes in, in terms of donations and YouTube revenue (while she could still monetise it) and donations.
I'm not going to go into all the many many pieces of evidence on why KJK has the far right turning up to her events, as we've been here before and again the KJK faithful just refuse to see it - but yes, it's down to her and you're utterly naive if you think she can't help it that the far right turn up to her events, or it doesn't matter or refuse to accept it's even happening. The fact she usually refuses to denounce the far right should tell you all you need to know (I know it doesn't here though, sadly).
And this is what I mean about harming the movement - partly. She creates schisms by inventing narratives about other activists that are just untrue. WPUK and others on the left do plenty of work behind the scenes that is making real change. KJK should knows this well, but it doesn't suit her narrative, so she pushes a narrative that they are more interested in theory than action. It's a nonsense.
And it's why this thread is here. She's creating a narrative about CAN SG that just isn't true. There is no reason for GC people to be against CAN SG - other than a manufactured narrative that KJK is pushing. She's encouraging you all to think CAN SG is something it isn't, and to stand against them. It's exactly what the TRAs do with GC feminists - they monster us, creating a false narrative on what we're about, then stand against that fictional monster they've created.
Please ask yourself why KJK would do this?
It's pretty obvious to me, it's because her aim isn't to create change (if it was, she'd be celebrating the progress that the CAN SG conference represents), it's to make money and feed her narcissistic ego. I'm sorry you can't see it.
She also has the fucking cheek to claim other activists sucesses as her own. She knows full well that there is a lot of work behind the scenes that the people involved can't talk about publicly, and so she lies that they are doing nothing / are more interested in theory, and then when things do show signs of changing, she claims it's because of her, not the countless hours and thankless task of lobbying those with power to make change, or holding the line behind the scenes in difficult circumstances (e.g. the VAWG sector).
Are KJK's events where she invites ordinary women to stand up and speak about their experiences part of her 'toxic actions'?
Yes, absolutely. She invites ordinary women into dangerous situations she's created, where TRAs often turn up, and she also invites the far right and puts them at risk. She doesn't do nearly enough to ensure the safety of those women, I can only conclude she doesn't give a fuck about them.
The act of standing up and saying your piece is empowering, but it's not being built on at a LWS event. It's just preaching to the converted, and the voices are often drowned out by TRAs. But, the more contraversial the content (because of TRA or far right involvement) the more attention she gets and the more money she makes out of it. She's using those women for content creation which she can monitise, to pay for her mortgage and lifestyle, while putting them at serious risk of physical harm. It's only a matter of time before someone gets seriously hurt.
I know you'll just argue with me as you don't want to accept it, but it's pretty clear from here.
All movements where entry is easy, and money and platforms are given to those who put the effort in, are open to exploitation and/or narcs.
KJK is exploiting the GC movement, and her rhetoric has been very damaging, I'm sorry if you can't see it. Hopefully attacking the very medics who whistleblew about GIDS in the first place will open some people's eyes to how she's manipulating people into going against anyone who's not bowing down to her, it's narcissism 101.