I can’t disagree with the argument regarding Genspect. For me, they’re the gender identity equivalent of promoting vapes for smokers rather than cigarettes - they keep the addiction alive but claim to be making the addiction a bit less harmful.
I particularly liked this paragraph, it really spoke to me (given that I'm a culchie pleb):
'The gender industry is an industry of the ruling class. While Genspect, and organizations like them, are intent on creating a better NGO that keep the illusion of “gender people” alive, they do so at the expense of everyone suffering under this regime. This is privileged activism and the only ones helped by it are those participating in it. Furthermore, any gain from this pursuit is temporary since it ultimately feeds the system that will come for those who Genspect is purportedly trying to help. This is class warfare, and Genspect, as it grows, is already positioning itself to be beyond critique, and is overpowering more urgent voices, such as that of physicians like Dr. Grossman.'