Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

OP posts:
Thread gallery
95
Merrymouse · 09/03/2024 19:38

suggestionsplease1 · 09/03/2024 19:26

Ah, no.

You have done a very poor analysis if you have arrived at that position.

But no, it is you who have failed to appreciate the salient points.

Rainbowshit · 09/03/2024 19:39

One good thing to come out of this incident is that more people are being made aware of NCHI recording and how ludicrous and frightening it is.

Waitwhat23 · 09/03/2024 19:41

Waitwhat23 · 09/03/2024 18:08

Ooh my heid's melted now after trawling through Parliamentary debate records but in respect to amendments relating to the monitoring of the impact of the GRR bill on women and girls -

Amendments discussed on day 2 of the 3rd stage -

www.parliament.scot/bills-and-laws/bills/gender-recognition-reform-scotland-bill

Rachel Hamilton regarding amendment 121 -

www.theyworkforyou.com/sp/?id=2022-12-21.1.212

Voted down.

Amendment 61 - Pam Gosal (pictured)

Voted down

Amendment 58. - Brian Whittle (pictured)

Voted down

You can find all amendments and the votes on here -

www.parliament.scot/bills-and-laws/bills/gender-recognition-reform-scotland-bill

Arrrgh. The first link should have been this one -

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/sp/?id=2022-12-21.3.0

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

– in the Scottish Parliament at 21 December 2022

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/sp?id=2022-12-21.3.0

nutmeg7 · 09/03/2024 19:43

suggestionsplease1 · 09/03/2024 13:53

Nowhere am I claiming causation, I don't need to.

The GC argument on the other hand needs to show that self-ID is detrimental to women.

They should be finding that the countries who have put in place self- ID are falling down the league tables for women's equality and well-being after introducing it, not staying at the top, which they are presently doing.

What they “should” be finding depends very much on WHAT is being measured under the category of women’s equality and wellbeing.

Trans access to women’s single sex spaces, support schemes etc is unlikely to have ANY effect on women’s pay, maternity rights and so on.

But what needs to be captured is the gradual erosion of women’s place in sports, women’s ability to self-organise without biological males present, or the discomfort in having to use mixed sex changing rooms and toilets. Making the world a bit crappier and more stressful for women in these areas is unlikely to be measured or captured in the usual “key indicators” for women’s equality.

And you were certainly implying some sort of causation by linking the two things in the first place. Or why point out the apparent correlation?

NonPlayerCharacter · 09/03/2024 19:47

Nowhere am I claiming causation, I don't need to.The GC argument on the other hand needs to show that self-ID is detrimental to women.

"I don't have to justify or prove anything I say, but everyone who disagrees with me does."

Helleofabore · 09/03/2024 19:49

Merrymouse · 09/03/2024 18:21

Exactly.

(And I’m still intrigued about how Rwanda did so well in these tables).

As I mentioned it is also about the ‘gap’. It is not a declaration that the country is doing ‘well’ by the women. Considering the mortality in childbirth figures as well.

It shows that the ‘values’ are actually nonsensical. And certainly not showing what the poster desperately wants it to be.

RethinkingLife · 09/03/2024 19:57

NonPlayerCharacter · 09/03/2024 19:47

Nowhere am I claiming causation, I don't need to.The GC argument on the other hand needs to show that self-ID is detrimental to women.

"I don't have to justify or prove anything I say, but everyone who disagrees with me does."

Agreed with your version NPC.

Chesterton's Fence.

When we seek to intervene in any system created by someone, it’s not enough to view their decisions and choices simply as the consequences of first-order thinking because we can inadvertently create serious problems. Before changing anything, we should wonder whether they were using second-order thinking. Their reasons for making certain choices might be more complex than they seem at first. It’s best to assume they knew things we don’t or had experience we can’t fathom, so we don’t go for quick fixes and end up making things worse.
Second-order thinking is the practice of not just considering the consequences of our decisions but also the consequences of those consequences. Everyone can manage first-order thinking, which is just considering the immediate anticipated result of an action. It’s simple and quick, usually requiring little effort. By comparison, second-order thinking is more complex and time-consuming. The fact that it is difficult and unusual is what makes the ability to do it such a powerful advantage

https://fs.blog/chestertons-fence/

Emotionalsupportviper · 09/03/2024 20:52

NonPlayerCharacter · 09/03/2024 19:32

I'm sure we will all be giving your opinion on what constitutes poor analysis the respect it is due.

Grin
Mollyollydolly · 09/03/2024 21:49

Eh up she's logged on again

JKR vs IW
RethinkingLife · 09/03/2024 22:05

First time in my life I've ever read that useful Housman quotation.

Yet again, thank you, JKR. 😍

SidewaysOtter · 09/03/2024 22:08

JayAlfredPrufrock · 09/03/2024 17:02

Being a trans woman is a choice.

Being a woman is not.

Quite. And whatever issues affect trans women, it’s not the job of actual women* to fix those issues.

(*Adult human females)

SamW98 · 09/03/2024 22:13

😘

JKR vs IW
Mollyollydolly · 09/03/2024 22:14

Rachel Rooney's response. I cant stop laughing.

JKR vs IW
SidewaysOtter · 09/03/2024 22:44

“…and in his anger he stamped with his right foot so hard that it went into the ground above his knee; then he seized his left foot with both his hands in such a fury that he split in two, and there was an end of him.”

Grin
Cattenberg · 09/03/2024 22:46

Police been useless. They don't want the headache of dealing with the Home
Secretary, Daily Mail etc so are ducking it.

Or it could be that the police aren’t able to charge someone with a crime, if no actual crime has been committed.

Crankywiddershins · 09/03/2024 23:01

SamW98 · 09/03/2024 22:13

😘

Ouch!

DrBlackbird · 09/03/2024 23:12

borntobequiet · 09/03/2024 18:16

if you were to plot women's well-being and trans peoples well-being on different axes of a graph, and establish a scatter plot of corresponding data points on it, and then create a line of best fit through these points, you would clearly see an excellent correlation between the countries doing well for trans people and those doing well for women.

And if you did the same for, say, domestic pets’ well being and trans peoples well-being, you’d likely get the same, because both are markers of a liberal and affluent society. Tells you - well, not very much.

Exactly. This spurious correlation between two unconnected claims is puzzling and just so nonsensical. Always some sort of gotcha that just really isn’t there.

SabrinaThwaite · 09/03/2024 23:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

suggestionsplease1 · 10/03/2024 00:03

DrBlackbird · 09/03/2024 23:12

Exactly. This spurious correlation between two unconnected claims is puzzling and just so nonsensical. Always some sort of gotcha that just really isn’t there.

Except this is not the case.

You would not get the same tight correlation for pet well-being against trans person well-being in an international cross-country comparison analysis that you would get for women's well-being & trans peoples well-being correlational analysis.

If you think you have this (you do not) go ahead and post your figures.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/03/2024 01:13

Why Willoughby can't just live Willoughby's truth and leave us out of it, I don't know.

lonelywater · 10/03/2024 01:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ATerrorofLeftovers · 10/03/2024 01:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

India won’t be happy until India has full control of everyone. Their thoughts, beliefs, speech and behaviour. Unless everyone goes along with exactly what India wants them to, the rage will continue. It’s sad, really, in many ways.

NonPlayerCharacter · 10/03/2024 06:52

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/03/2024 01:13

Why Willoughby can't just live Willoughby's truth and leave us out of it, I don't know.

Because that truth requires everyone else to go along with it. People often compare it to being gay, but it's not comparable. Being gay is nothing to do with anyone else; if everyone at work turned gay tomorrow, you would never know unless they told you and it wouldn't require anything from you. It's nothing to do with anyone except themselves and their partners. It requires no reflection or validation from anyone else. It's an innate truth.

IW's truth, though, requires reflection and validation from everyone who meets or even mentions IW. It's not an innate truth like being gay (because it's not a truth at all). Some people may genuinely believe IW to be a woman (well they don't, but they'll never admit it), some might be on board with the truth but happy to deny it to be polite, but some people don't want to pretend and they aren't obliged to - and that's what's happened here.

JKR doesn't misgender people as a matter of course, but IW forced her to the discourtesy, as I believe the phrase goes. And at the end of the day, the right to tell the objective truth and not be compelled to lie must win out over IW's need for constant validation and submission from literally everyone else, which is where IW's "truth" lives.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread