This person was no more or less trans than anyone else who says 'I am trans' - that's what we are told by TRAs as to what being trans is. There is no external assessment to 'prove' you're transgender, unless you get a GRC in which you have to 'live as a woman', which, again, has no actual criteria (I believe changing your name or gender on forms is sufficient).
I'm happy to listen to your arguments that only the nice harmless people are really trans, and if we create policies that allow anyone IDing as women into female spaces that then go on to cause harm, Whoops! Well it doesn't count as they weren't really trans.
But if you think there are levels of people who are really TW and people who are pretending you will need to explain what the difference is and why it matters.
Yep bore off. He was a very violent men who was due to be transferred to women’s prison according to reports
Right. And you think this means we're all getting our knickers in a twist about TW unreasonably because you think this person wasn't one? I don't think you do actually mean that.
Again - I'm arguing against the posters who are saying 'TS wasn't really trans'. Why? How? How do we stop people pretending to be trans, because surely that's a massive issue? Will we actually need to come up with some kind of criteria when letting males into women's spaces? What would that look like?