Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

BBC News does not inform readers cat killer and murderer Scarlett Blake is transgender in this article. I intend to complain to ofcom. These are not our crimes.

368 replies

Heylo · 26/02/2024 15:13

Has anyone seen this recent article on the transgender (trans woman) Scarlett Blake who was sentenced to 24 years today for murdering a man. Blake also killed a cat. Pls see this recent article from bbc news. BBC news puts nowhere in article that Blake is transgender. Uses pronouns ‘she’ and refers to Blake as a woman.

bbc article here https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-68401335

These are not our crimes. I am reporting the omission of the fact Blake is transgender to Ofcom. I wonder if anyone is thinking the same (about reporting to ofcom, here is the link: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/complaints )

Make a complaint

Ofcom may be able to help you complain about phone, broadband and postal services, TV, radio and on-demand programmes, interference to wireless devices, or something you have seen on a video-sharing platform.

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/complaints

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
SweetcornFritter · 27/02/2024 07:39

“Ministry of Justice figures show at least 181 of the 244 transgender inmates, more than 74%, are in jail for crimes including rape, forcing children into having sex, grievous bodily harm and robbery” - an important statistic that presumably the Trans Fans would prefer was obfuscated by recording such male crimes as female. .

Peskysquirrel · 27/02/2024 07:41

WaitingforSpring24 · 27/02/2024 01:33

Also, just for the naysayers.

Why do you think we read and get the news? Why are things reported?

Because we are social and political animals, and we make decisions about our society based on our responses to what we see is going on in our world, and what our threats are.

So if gender is not important, why do we get news describing she or he? Why is it not ‘a human being’. If class or location or details are not important, why bother? Why would news just say ‘a human being did something bad to someone or something.’

It’s because we respond, we react, we alter our perceptions and make judgements. Our input makes our output.

This is why there is rightful complaint if news is reported in a racist way - as our input created our output.

Of course it’s bloody important! 🙄

Great Post @WaitingforSpring24

VegetablesFightingToReclaimTheAubergieneEmoji · 27/02/2024 07:41

This initially was reported on the bbc without any gender, they had followed thames valleys example. The comments were interestingly pointed, they (in)corrected it later to say she.

ArabellaScott · 27/02/2024 08:13

oatmilk4breakfast · 27/02/2024 06:49

A short sharp campaign is needed - kill someone, lose your right to choose your pronouns. Surely?

No. Pronouns are not a 'right' that is dependent on good behaviour. Society needs to use accurate information to function. Gaslighting anyone by deliberately using descriptors we know to be factually incorrect is damaging and confusing.

Kucinghitam · 27/02/2024 08:30

BodensFinger · 26/02/2024 20:38

Just pondering what sort of person you’d have to be to defend a sadistic murderers gender identity over the feelings of the poor man’s family.

As is crystal clear from this thread, the sort of person who is completely high on their own Right-Side-Of-History Beeeeee-Kind Good-Person obfuscatory look-over-there-at-that-squirrel whataboutery word-cloud Righteous Farts.

SirChenjins · 27/02/2024 08:31

SweetcornFritter · 27/02/2024 07:39

“Ministry of Justice figures show at least 181 of the 244 transgender inmates, more than 74%, are in jail for crimes including rape, forcing children into having sex, grievous bodily harm and robbery” - an important statistic that presumably the Trans Fans would prefer was obfuscated by recording such male crimes as female. .

And there's just something - can't quite think what - that tells me those transgender inmates (other than the rapists of course) aren't the female born ones.

Ofcourseshecan · 27/02/2024 08:45

The Independent’s story today doesn’t mention that ‘she’ is male until the 21st paragraph. How many people would read that far?

Also, At the time, Blake had been in an online relationship with a woman, Ashlynn Bell, in the US, with the two frequently discussing gore, murder and strangulation together.

It doesn’t even mention that his American friend is also male. Just two ‘women’ who enjoy random violence.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/scarlet-blake-oxford-jailed-jorge-martin-carreno-b2502991.html

No wonder we read that there’s been an upsurge in violent crime by women over recent years. With male criminals routinely recorded as female if they want to be, the statistics are useless.

Cat killer who told her lover that strangling random man was ‘hot’ jailed for murder

WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT: Scarlet Blake live-streamed herself dissecting a cat before putting its body in a blender just months before murdering Jorge Martin Carreno

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/scarlet-blake-oxford-jailed-jorge-martin-carreno-b2502991.html

HBGKC · 27/02/2024 09:12

"How about when it comes to sadistic killers and rapists we forgo the polite fiction that humans can change sex and go with the very accurate 'man'?"

@Girlontherailreplacementbusservice I don't disagree with this at all. These ridiculous articles are being written because 'we' took the mis-step of allowing the legal fiction that someone can change sex, even though we all know that is impossible to do. But that is where we now are, and until that changes, we need to find ways of engaging with the general public about it.

Thank you, @Peskysquirrel - I think Helen Joyce uses a similar construction, so we're in good company.

Peskysquirrel · 27/02/2024 09:32

jm9138 · 26/02/2024 23:23

And I think you know the point I am making.

I stated in my first post the OP had a point. You think this is a great slogan to express that then go for it. I am allowed my opinion that I don’t think it is a great slogan and pointed out why. I would suggest if one person who agrees with the OP thinks it is a dreadful slogan then you are alienating a lot of other people who agree with you.

The problem with slogans that simplify things too much and are catchy is that they can be used by other people who may have diametrically opposed views to yours and then weaken your whole argument. So ‘my body my choice’ - great. Then the anti vaccination right took it up in America and, in some instances, by the trans lobby.

It is not a hill I am going to die on though. I have made my point. I doubt I am not going to convince you it is a shit slogan that actually is pretty nasty any more than you will be able to convince me that it is a great slogan that will bring everyone to your point of view.

No, I do not know the point you are making. That is because you are trying to divert and obfuscate the issue by coming on here trying to claim "not our crimes" refers to Asian people.

You seem to be telling women to sit down and shut up and not use this slogan because other groups might appropriate it. No. We will not shut up. If others hijack the slogan that is up to them. Context is everything. Google "not our crimes" and look what comes up. That will tell you all you need to know about context and how this slogan is being used. I don't see any "weakened argument" there.

Here's your real point. You are clearly male. You do not like the slogan "not our crimes" because you feel indignant as if somehow you personally are being blamed for all crimes committed by males.

I base this on the fact that you said "it implies that the crimes of an individual are the responsibility of or ‘owned by’ people who share a characteristic with that individual".

No, it does not imply any 'responsibility' in that way. No more than I am 'responsible' for Lucy Letby's crimes because she's female and so am I. But I accept 100% that she belongs to the same sex class as me. I don't feel personally blamed by that fact.

Male violence is a big problem in society. Men need to step up and address it. Not get personally butt-hurt because they feel they're being got at. As the 10th rule of misogyny says, "the worst thing about male violence is that it makes men look bad".

So we will keep on using our supposed "shit slogan that actually is pretty nasty", thanks. It's actually proved to be very effective over the past few days because it's highlighted the problem of language manipulation in the media. And if some men don't like it, well they need to deal with that.

Tortoise2go · 27/02/2024 09:34

Why wasn't he/she detained for the cat crime? That is absolutely horrendous , especially as it lead to another horrible murder.

IcakethereforeIam · 27/02/2024 09:35

There's a detail in the Independent which would have made me rage if I had any respect left for the publication. Fortunately, I lost that years ago. The bottom of the article, links for more information categories

Sorry, I don't know why it's so big

BBC News does not inform readers cat killer and murderer Scarlett Blake is transgender in this article. I intend to complain to ofcom. These are not our crimes.
Peskysquirrel · 27/02/2024 09:50

Tortoise2go · 27/02/2024 09:34

Why wasn't he/she detained for the cat crime? That is absolutely horrendous , especially as it lead to another horrible murder.

Yes it is horrendous. Studies have shown that people who start by being cruel to animals often go on to commit worse crimes. Same with "flashing" which used to be (often still is) treated as a bit of a joke, but has come to be recognised as a precursor to worse sexual crimes.
Problem is you can't arrest someone for something they 'might' do, I guess.

fabio12 · 27/02/2024 10:00

That Unherd article is spot on. I had no idea the beeb had so many trans workers but a lot of things are making sense now. We do seem to have been bombarded with trans issues whilst being told repeatedly they are a tiny % of population. I used to love Married at First Sight but the man there talking about how his 'vagina' was better than all of the women's made me feel sick and I've not looked at trans the same way since - I actually didn't think I cared much either way before hearing him going on. They don't do themselves any favours shoving it down everyone's throats but I suspect they like riling people up as part of the fun/confrontation. Again a very male thing.

maudelovesharold · 27/02/2024 10:19

fabio12 · 27/02/2024 10:00

That Unherd article is spot on. I had no idea the beeb had so many trans workers but a lot of things are making sense now. We do seem to have been bombarded with trans issues whilst being told repeatedly they are a tiny % of population. I used to love Married at First Sight but the man there talking about how his 'vagina' was better than all of the women's made me feel sick and I've not looked at trans the same way since - I actually didn't think I cared much either way before hearing him going on. They don't do themselves any favours shoving it down everyone's throats but I suspect they like riling people up as part of the fun/confrontation. Again a very male thing.

Yes, the Unherd article is very good. As are some of the comments below it!

Pocketfullofdogtreats · 27/02/2024 10:28

I saw this story for the first time on BBC News at 10 last night. Although they referred to this person as a 'she' throughout, they did make it clear that this was a man who now identified as a woman, but would spend their sentence in a male prison. So I did give a little cheer!

Farmageddon · 27/02/2024 10:28

fabio12 · 27/02/2024 10:00

That Unherd article is spot on. I had no idea the beeb had so many trans workers but a lot of things are making sense now. We do seem to have been bombarded with trans issues whilst being told repeatedly they are a tiny % of population. I used to love Married at First Sight but the man there talking about how his 'vagina' was better than all of the women's made me feel sick and I've not looked at trans the same way since - I actually didn't think I cared much either way before hearing him going on. They don't do themselves any favours shoving it down everyone's throats but I suspect they like riling people up as part of the fun/confrontation. Again a very male thing.

I agree, I think some of the problems we have with the media reporting on this issue is the fact that many young people who buy this bullshit go in to journalism and media jobs - not to report the news, but to push their own agenda. They seem to see it as their duty to be a campaigner rather than an employee. Rules and truth be damned, they are activists first and foremost.

If they were heavily pushing some other form of ideology it would be rightly called out as blatant bias and unprofessional, but this issue seems to get a free pass. Added to that you have senior level management who seem unable or unwilling to deal with them properly, afraid of the fallout. Just look at the Guardian to see an organisation seemingly tearing itself apart trying to please everyone.

jm9138 · 27/02/2024 10:30

Peskysquirrel · 27/02/2024 09:32

No, I do not know the point you are making. That is because you are trying to divert and obfuscate the issue by coming on here trying to claim "not our crimes" refers to Asian people.

You seem to be telling women to sit down and shut up and not use this slogan because other groups might appropriate it. No. We will not shut up. If others hijack the slogan that is up to them. Context is everything. Google "not our crimes" and look what comes up. That will tell you all you need to know about context and how this slogan is being used. I don't see any "weakened argument" there.

Here's your real point. You are clearly male. You do not like the slogan "not our crimes" because you feel indignant as if somehow you personally are being blamed for all crimes committed by males.

I base this on the fact that you said "it implies that the crimes of an individual are the responsibility of or ‘owned by’ people who share a characteristic with that individual".

No, it does not imply any 'responsibility' in that way. No more than I am 'responsible' for Lucy Letby's crimes because she's female and so am I. But I accept 100% that she belongs to the same sex class as me. I don't feel personally blamed by that fact.

Male violence is a big problem in society. Men need to step up and address it. Not get personally butt-hurt because they feel they're being got at. As the 10th rule of misogyny says, "the worst thing about male violence is that it makes men look bad".

So we will keep on using our supposed "shit slogan that actually is pretty nasty", thanks. It's actually proved to be very effective over the past few days because it's highlighted the problem of language manipulation in the media. And if some men don't like it, well they need to deal with that.

I base this on the fact that you said "it implies that the crimes of an individual are the responsibility of or ‘owned by’ people who share a characteristic with that individual".

No, it does not imply any 'responsibility' in that way. No more than I am 'responsible' for Lucy Letby's crimes because she's female and so am I. But I accept 100% that she belongs to the same sex class as me. I don't feel personally blamed by that fact.

Absolutely right. It is not your responsibility that Lucy Letby killed babies. But then you say:

Male violence is a big problem in society. Men need to step up and address it. Not get personally butt-hurt because they feel they're being got at.

But the violence of some males is the responsibility of all males. Can you not see the contradiction in what you posted?

This is a completely pointless argument. As I said I agreed with the original poster. I agree 100% with their sentiment. If you like look at my other posts on similar issues you will see I have very strong views of the trans movement and the harm it is doing. I don't like the phrase (I am not the only one who posted they don't like it) and explained why.

I have complained myself numerous times to the BBC on how they report trans issues and how they seem to bombard us with selected stories all the time. So just today they had a big news story on the front page of the website about a non-binary identifying teen who was beaten up and bullied by three girls in a school toilet in America and died a while later (although it is not really clear whether the kicking was the sole cause of death or medical incompetence). Why is this story on the front page of the BBC? There are 70 people murdered every day in the US, so why choose this one? Yesterday a man was in court for stabbing to death two men in Halifax a couple of months ago, but this story only made the local BBC website. The bias in the BBC goes far deeper than just the pro nouns they have used for a murderer (which is not to minimise that) with the selective reporting and editorial oversight they have being far harder to spot unless you really look for it.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 27/02/2024 10:39

ArabellaScott · 27/02/2024 08:13

No. Pronouns are not a 'right' that is dependent on good behaviour. Society needs to use accurate information to function. Gaslighting anyone by deliberately using descriptors we know to be factually incorrect is damaging and confusing.

You're right. It's a courtesy, not a right, and others shouldn't be compelled to honour it.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 27/02/2024 10:46

jm9138 · 27/02/2024 10:30

I base this on the fact that you said "it implies that the crimes of an individual are the responsibility of or ‘owned by’ people who share a characteristic with that individual".

No, it does not imply any 'responsibility' in that way. No more than I am 'responsible' for Lucy Letby's crimes because she's female and so am I. But I accept 100% that she belongs to the same sex class as me. I don't feel personally blamed by that fact.

Absolutely right. It is not your responsibility that Lucy Letby killed babies. But then you say:

Male violence is a big problem in society. Men need to step up and address it. Not get personally butt-hurt because they feel they're being got at.

But the violence of some males is the responsibility of all males. Can you not see the contradiction in what you posted?

This is a completely pointless argument. As I said I agreed with the original poster. I agree 100% with their sentiment. If you like look at my other posts on similar issues you will see I have very strong views of the trans movement and the harm it is doing. I don't like the phrase (I am not the only one who posted they don't like it) and explained why.

I have complained myself numerous times to the BBC on how they report trans issues and how they seem to bombard us with selected stories all the time. So just today they had a big news story on the front page of the website about a non-binary identifying teen who was beaten up and bullied by three girls in a school toilet in America and died a while later (although it is not really clear whether the kicking was the sole cause of death or medical incompetence). Why is this story on the front page of the BBC? There are 70 people murdered every day in the US, so why choose this one? Yesterday a man was in court for stabbing to death two men in Halifax a couple of months ago, but this story only made the local BBC website. The bias in the BBC goes far deeper than just the pro nouns they have used for a murderer (which is not to minimise that) with the selective reporting and editorial oversight they have being far harder to spot unless you really look for it.

But the violence of some males is the responsibility of all males. Can you not see the contradiction in what you posted?

The only people who can fix male violence is men. Violent men do not listen to women. Men need to normalise asking for support, talking about bad feelings instead of using their fists, and walking away from a fight.

A substantial proportion of female-perpetrated murders are a woman with post-partum psychosis killing her child. Women are already campaigning to improve detection and treatment of that condition to prevent these murders. Men need to do similar for each other.

OldCrone · 27/02/2024 10:57

ArabellaScott · 27/02/2024 06:29

He was treated at the Tavi. Blockers and hormones. Also has a contact with Gender GP.

Has this been reported anywhere? I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere.

KCandtheSunlightBand · 27/02/2024 11:32

It’s going to be on Jeremy Vine show in Radio 2, concentrating in the male crime being reported as female, apparently.

oakleaffy · 27/02/2024 11:34

KCandtheSunlightBand · 27/02/2024 11:32

It’s going to be on Jeremy Vine show in Radio 2, concentrating in the male crime being reported as female, apparently.

I'll try to catch that on BBC 'Sounds' -if I can't catch it 'Live' . Thank you.

Edit : Is this today's show? Can't see any mention of this online for today.

catduckgoose · 27/02/2024 11:37

OldCrone · 27/02/2024 10:57

Has this been reported anywhere? I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13119563/amp/cat-killer-murder-oxford-transgender-victim-random-escort-called-police.html

Daily Mail article mentions it near the end of their article:

Blake was given puberty blockers when she was 17 and also received hormone treatment from the age of 18 after a referral to the Tavistock NHS gender clinic. She is still receiving hormone replacement therapy but has been kept in a Category A men’s prison.

How Oxford don's transgender daughter was betrayed by escort lover

Scarlet Blake, 26, targeted Jorge Martin Carreno, 30, as he walked home alone from a night out in Oxford in July 2021.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13119563/amp/cat-killer-murder-oxford-transgender-victim-random-escort-called-police.html

oakleaffy · 27/02/2024 11:39

Today's Jeremy Vine - Found it.. here:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001whqp

BBC News does not inform readers cat killer and murderer Scarlett Blake is transgender in this article. I intend to complain to ofcom. These are not our crimes.