in regards to "whats to say he wouldn't have been flashing his willy if he'd been raised a boy", as has been asked upthread - perhaps he would have been.
But had he been raised a boy he would not have been in the girls toilets by permission of all the adults in order to flash these girls.
And these girls would not have thought they were in a girls only space with another girl who then flashed "her" willy at them.
Those girls would not have been lied to for the past four years and would not have discovered they could not trust the adults supposed to care for them, or been disbelieved when they reported.
If this boy had been raised a boy, he would have flashed his willy in the playground, the girls would have told, the boy would get into trouble, parents informed and a note made on the safeguarding system. End of story. It's not even that rare an occurrence.
It is the lies and secrecy which has led to massive safeguarding failures for this boy and the girls, and the breaking of trust of for all the children in the class, but especially these girls, who have been sold a lie for the past four years which make this newsworthy.
The adults in charge of safeguarding and protecting children colluded in a lie, when the subject of that lie was much to young to understand the ramifications of it, which led to other children having being flashed at in a girls toilet which they thought was a penis free zone. Those children have now lost trust in the adults around them. The boy is showing clear signs that all is not well in his transition by a) exposing his genitalia and b) talking about dark spirits.
None of this would have happened had he "been raised a boy"
What about that is difficult to understand?