Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Jane Clare Jones on purity spirals

1000 replies

IamSarah · 12/01/2024 11:26

Really insightful post on X the platform formally known as Twitter I feel it's worth sharing on here:

x.com/janeclarejones/status/1745760345954689255?s=46&t=NGJBRqkXgp1UazF5I8yjXA

OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
RethinkingLife · 13/01/2024 15:49

SerotinaPickeler · 13/01/2024 15:20

That reminds me, my chin is a bit prickly, must find the tweezers (waves to Germaine)

It's not my chin for me, it's a single hair about 2 inches up from my jawline on one side (it grows from nothing to something lengthy and dark that coils overnight), and I have 2 recurrent white hairs at the nasal end of the philtrum. I feel this would be a useless disguise.

Tangent: is your username for Serafina Pekkala?

MidCenturyLangClegs · 13/01/2024 15:52

Youdontgivemeflowers · 13/01/2024 15:48

It’s because of your scathing personality Tinsel, that the trans widows movement hasn’t got off the ground. Everyone is afraid of you. Loads of trans widows won’t go anywhere near you. And nobody will offer an alternative because of fear of attacks from you. You need to stop being so abusive to people you don’t like

What the fresh hell is this.
You need to read Victoria Smith's HAGS.

AdamRyan · 13/01/2024 15:59

TrainedByCats · 13/01/2024 12:58

AdamRyan

She also called a bunch of archaeologists "woke" recently for using standard forensic archaeological techniques and as a scientist I find that quite alarming! Science is not "woke"!

I’d not heard anything about this so just went to read about it. You’ve misrepresented the context somewhat, and as a non British origin woman my opinion of Badenoch has risen after reading her remarks and the context. The researchers sample size was risible, if that’s standard forensic archaeological technique it’s anything but scientific.

Edited

Using measurements and then statistically comparing to other "known" bones to extrapolate the group a sample from is a known technique in archaeology and palaeontology. Used for animals as well as humans.
She said it was like phrenology. Very unwarranted (and this is nothing to do with sample size or the reliability of the findings).
Its not a good idea to wade into a debate where you don't understand the science and call it woke. Makes me question her judgement.

SerotinaPickeler · 13/01/2024 16:01

RethinkingLife · 13/01/2024 15:49

It's not my chin for me, it's a single hair about 2 inches up from my jawline on one side (it grows from nothing to something lengthy and dark that coils overnight), and I have 2 recurrent white hairs at the nasal end of the philtrum. I feel this would be a useless disguise.

Tangent: is your username for Serafina Pekkala?

Yes re: name, but I'm more of a gardening pickling witch though, also gooseless.

Melroses · 13/01/2024 16:03

Youdontgivemeflowers · 13/01/2024 15:48

It’s because of your scathing personality Tinsel, that the trans widows movement hasn’t got off the ground. Everyone is afraid of you. Loads of trans widows won’t go anywhere near you. And nobody will offer an alternative because of fear of attacks from you. You need to stop being so abusive to people you don’t like

Good Luck Charlie What GIF

Huh?

AdamRyan · 13/01/2024 16:07

nothingcomestonothing · 13/01/2024 13:50

I don't post here much any more because of the group think and cliquiness, plus tendency to revert to personal attacks and misrepresentation if you are "the wrong kind of woman"

I'm late on this (pesky real life) but nice DARVO there. What you have described is the contents of JCJ's tweet, in a nutshell.

IMHO it was ill-advised for her to post the tweet, but even more so for OP to repeat it here using the 'Sarah' namechange. Many women here proudly support the campaign for single sex rape support, and it's not right to try to leverage that to smear other women or accuse other women of not feministing properly.

Look at hewpos post two above yours, for what I mean in a context that's nothing to do with me.
Unpleasant and rude. Because a group on here have decided Sarah and the Brighton feminists (whatever that means) are the wrong kind of feminist.

That's how I read it as someone new to the JCJ/KJK argument.

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 13/01/2024 16:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TinselAngel · 13/01/2024 16:07

Youdontgivemeflowers · 13/01/2024 15:48

It’s because of your scathing personality Tinsel, that the trans widows movement hasn’t got off the ground. Everyone is afraid of you. Loads of trans widows won’t go anywhere near you. And nobody will offer an alternative because of fear of attacks from you. You need to stop being so abusive to people you don’t like

Lol

HPFA · 13/01/2024 16:08

pickledandpuzzled · 12/01/2024 13:42

Speaking as someone outside all the circles and only vaguely aware of these rifts…

I find it so easy to see how and when to ally or avoid people.

On an issue by issue basis, I agree with many individuals and organisations.
What Campaigner A does on certain issues is great. When he approaches women’s rights- reproductive rights etc- he’s not.

Why is that hard? Why can’t we ally on some areas and avoid each other on others?

Campaigning on single issues obviously wouldn't work if people couldn't set aside differences on other things.

But to be successful it probably demands that everyone agrees not to use the issue to actively promote the things they disagree on.

So, you might agree to disagree with someone about the need for urgent action on climate change but what about when that person starts actively campaigning on the lines of "the same people who tell you there's no such thing as a woman are the same people who tell you we need action on climate change #CLIMATESCAM?" Then you're facing the fact that by campaigning for women's rights you could be effectively encouraging climate denial.

MidCenturyLangClegs · 13/01/2024 16:10

@Youdontgivemeflowers that was completely uncalled for. Women across the world have learnt from Tinsel. I know because whilst not a transwidow per se .. I nearly was.. but I read Tinsel's writings way before I even knew my ex was an AGP.
I don't particularly care if Tinsel can be scathing, the public service she has done for women in relationships with AGP abusers deserves an OBE

DialSquare · 13/01/2024 16:13

Youdontgivemeflowers · 13/01/2024 15:48

It’s because of your scathing personality Tinsel, that the trans widows movement hasn’t got off the ground. Everyone is afraid of you. Loads of trans widows won’t go anywhere near you. And nobody will offer an alternative because of fear of attacks from you. You need to stop being so abusive to people you don’t like

So you abuse Tinsel, then tell her she should stop being so abusive?

Froodwithatowel · 13/01/2024 16:14

Isn't it interesting that all of a woman's many achievements and very obvious successes are supposedly devalued by the suggestion that she may not be being nice enough?

I suppose though Tinsel you've been called scathing as opposed to racist, it's a variant on the same basic principle. Get women in line by suggesting if they're not the right sort behaving in the right way that they won't matter.

I don't think the left has really clicked yet that the days of this working are over.

AdamRyan · 13/01/2024 16:17

pickledandpuzzled · 13/01/2024 14:45

Thanks for this, I’ll know what to look out for

I’m really uneasy when I see people like her and Suella having their colour used against them, as though they are obliged to feel and believe certain things in solidarity with other people of colour.
It’s like seeing the ASD cohort falling out over whether it’s a superpower or not.

I am uncomfortable with the notion I'm against them because of their colour.
I don't care that one is a black woman and one is a brown woman, I disagree with (both of their) politics and think they are harmful to women.
Badenoch because she wants to get rid of the EA (in my opinion) which has done a lot to protect women (in my opinion)
Braverman because she cynically used racial tensions to stir up support for her agenda (in my opinion) whilst ignoring the systematic underfunding and misogyny that leaves girls in care subject to grooming and sexual abuse (in my opinion).

I also don't like Miriam Cates (white) because she seems to have a very regressive view of women's roles in the home and society (in my opinion) and wants to legislate so we all are encouraged to fulfil those roles (in my opinion).

I have a list as long as your arm of male MPs I dislike. And some female labour ones. But it doesn't often come up on here because there aren't the cheerleaders for those MPs in the same way there are for the above three.

Froodwithatowel · 13/01/2024 16:17

I am about to raise a glass to the many fantastic scathing women around these parts and the difference they have made, including Ms Magdalen of 'I'd rather be rude than a fucking liar' and 'they chop it off, Alex' fame. Wine

EasternStandard · 13/01/2024 16:21

Interesting for this

She wrote: “My embodied reality as a member of the oppressed sex class is experienced in a world where biology has a significant impact. You can believe what you want but I believe that biological sex is a real thing and neither law or some kind of new scientific concensus wld change that.”

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 13/01/2024 16:21

DialSquare · 13/01/2024 16:13

So you abuse Tinsel, then tell her she should stop being so abusive?

It's very hypocritical, isn't it?

AdamRyan · 13/01/2024 16:22

RebelliousCow · 13/01/2024 14:56

Bur feminism has as many definitions as there are women who identify as such. If it is entirely predicated on the oppressor/oppressed dyamic - then for me it is an ideological construct like any other, and no more an indicator of truth or reality.

Earlier on you said you thought i was prejudiced against women of other cultures and backgrounds. I'm not. But I don't accept that just because someone is from a supposedly 'oppressed' group that I must shut up and not question or critique anything they say or any beliefs they may adhere to. For me, feminism is about recognising and honouring what unites us all as females - the shared or common experiences and honouring and giving voice to that. Those things tend to be related to our experience of living in a female body and the things that flow from that.

Edited

I suppose for me I don't think much unites women - only biology and patriarchal behaviours stemming from oppression of women (sexual harassment, belittling, exclusion, etc etc).

I'm as likely to disagree with a woman's opinion as I am with a mans. What I want is to see women treated with the same human rights, dignity and respect men enjoy.

pickledandpuzzled · 13/01/2024 16:24

To clarify, @AdamRyan , my statement wasn’t at all aimed at you- it’s charges I’ve read elsewhere that they are traitors of some kind.

Separately, I assumed the post aimed at Tinsel was a joke based on earlier posts. Are you telling me that was a direct personal attack on Tinsel?

DialSquare · 13/01/2024 16:27

pickledandpuzzled · 13/01/2024 16:24

To clarify, @AdamRyan , my statement wasn’t at all aimed at you- it’s charges I’ve read elsewhere that they are traitors of some kind.

Separately, I assumed the post aimed at Tinsel was a joke based on earlier posts. Are you telling me that was a direct personal attack on Tinsel?

It was definitely an attack. See that poster's earlier post on this thread.

LoobiJee · 13/01/2024 16:28

pickledandpuzzled · 13/01/2024 16:24

To clarify, @AdamRyan , my statement wasn’t at all aimed at you- it’s charges I’ve read elsewhere that they are traitors of some kind.

Separately, I assumed the post aimed at Tinsel was a joke based on earlier posts. Are you telling me that was a direct personal attack on Tinsel?

That was my reaction, pickled, I assumed it was the poster being ironic / humorous. But from others’ reaction it looks like I assumed wrongly.

Helleofabore · 13/01/2024 16:29

No it was a personal attack on tinsel.

Datun · 13/01/2024 16:30

LoobiJee · 13/01/2024 16:28

That was my reaction, pickled, I assumed it was the poster being ironic / humorous. But from others’ reaction it looks like I assumed wrongly.

Same. That's what happens when you post the opposite of what is actually occurring. People think it's irony.

TinselAngel · 13/01/2024 16:32

I assumed it was serious. Risibly untrue, but meant seriously.

MidCenturyLangClegs · 13/01/2024 16:32

I have no doubt *flowers is a man or a Brighton handmaiden. MRAs both.
Sorry but not sorry but this was personal attack on Tinsel which was really bloody awful. Saying that we are scared of her? Codswallop.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread