DARVO.
Does the MRA (male supremacist) movement remotely resemble anything you've ever seen on the 'progressive' left?
Me, neither.
But it does show some marked similarities with the (censorious, sexist, homophobic) old right.
The left/right distinction barely exists in any meaningful sense anymore - it's just lazy ideological compartmentalization. To accept or reject ideas based on what area of the political spectrum they happen to come from is a shortcut to actually thinking.
This smearing of feminism with the alt right accusation isn't new. It's been a concerted effort for some time. Along with a more recent one determinedly associating FWR with white supremacism. Coincidence?
I've done some searching around Megyn Kelly, including videos of her alleged racism. I'd never heard of her before. She sounds a horror. I don't for one minute stand with those views, nor with the covert homophobia she demonstrated in the opening minutes of that footage. (I saw the whole thing. I will not be told what I can and cannot watch).
I hold views that are certainly GC - doesn't mean I 'align' with or share the views of every other GC person. I admire KJK's courage in the face of bullying and intimidation; I strongly disagree with some of her assertions. Megyn Kelly's white supremacism and misogynistic views I find nothing short of disgusting - to the point that I question her motivation in standing for women's rights as eloquently as she does in this video when she's made numerous anti-women points I find nothing short of thoroughly offensive. (Likewise Maureen Lipman and Jilly Cooper, who told women off for making a lot of fuss about nothing surrounding #MeToo. That noise can get to fuck.
Nonetheless, she's articulate and persuasive and I agree with most of what she has to say on this footage. It's an infantile, no-shades-of-grey lookout that it's mandatory to agree with every word someone says or none, and if they once utter a questionable comment, it's necessary to dismiss them on every other basis. A four-year-old child can reason this out.
But that's the strategy. The utter lack of nuance that's sprung up with the MRA/TRAs is interesting. They can't all be stupid - I know a good number who are highly intelligent - yet they can't argue a coherent case. 280 characters per tweet doesn't allow for much detail or variation: it's also an effective means of closing down (inconvenient) debate.