Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Glinner calling women "handmaidens"

268 replies

ftmquestions · 21/06/2023 22:34

Respect to glinner for speaking up but does anyone else consider his use of the term "handmaiden" grating? I don't like men calling women sexist names because they don't agree with him. Not one to criticise usually, cba with purity politics etc - and he can say what he likes - but I just wondered if I was alone in this making me bristle slightly

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
mirax · 22/06/2023 07:28

ftmquestions · 22/06/2023 05:41

Ah it's just the way he uses it really grates on me "xyz, handmaiden". I just find it sexist and annoying. It's like when men say "shut up, terf". I find tra women very annoying too but regardless I don't like seeing a man call women handmaidens in the name of defending their rights. Just doesn't sit well with me. This is not a "purity politics" or "language policing" tuning (am team kjk and don't like the jcj style of critiquing the gender movement) I simply bristle at this and wondered if I was alone

I dont share your concerns at all and many women, espcially the professional feminist organisations deserve worse names than handmaiden for what they have allied themselves to.

Florissante · 22/06/2023 07:32

FriendlyNeighbourhoodTrans · 21/06/2023 23:35

First post! Trans person here - having seen a little of what he's posted on Twitter and his blog thing (not too much, as I find his mental decline quite depressing to watch), it does seem like he feels entitled to the support of women in a way that he doesn't with men, and as such when any women falls on the wrong side of his Us vs Them dynamic he more often speaks in terms of "betrayal". Which sounds very patriarchal if you ask me...

In a similar vein, does it not bother Mumsnet that Linehan's last ban was for making death threats towards a group of women? Doesn't that puncture the illusion that he's in this for any reason other than it gives him a license to hate?

Because it's not just "handmaiden" he uses - he frequently accuses complete strangers of being groomers, paedophiles or some other form of irredeemable evil that means he doesn't have to treat them as people.

Biscuit
Florissante · 22/06/2023 07:32

ftmquestions · 22/06/2023 07:23

Yeah that is absolutely mental isn't it!

I agree.

Florissante · 22/06/2023 07:34

GrimDamnFanjo · 22/06/2023 00:17

It's all very well to criticise Glinner for not engaging with "the arguments." We know that's pointless as the endgame is removal of sex and replacement with gender.
For all his faults he's been one of the few high profile commentators and stuck his neck out paying a very high personal price.

Well put.

Florissante · 22/06/2023 07:35

FriendlyNeighbourhoodTrans · 22/06/2023 00:10

@BigMaggieShoes @RoseslnTheHospital Believe me I'd love to if I could, but attempting dialogue with Linehan has repeatedly been shown to be pointless as he refuses to in any way engage with the arguments of anyone who disagrees with him. And how could he? His entire business model now relies on him being the terfiest terf to ever terf, so he can be a leader of a community and extract subscriptions from his followers. The prospect of a renewed comedy career or his musical are entirely unavailable to him now, so he's economically trapped himself in his present mode of existence. Also, he literally blocks everyone on his substack from commenting who does not pay him money :/

Was more just curious (since this thread seemed to be a discussion about his conduct) where the line was for different members of this forum when it came to the man and the various things he does.

Gosh. Imagine that. Refusing to debate.

HellsTeethandBucketsofBlood · 22/06/2023 07:36

Margotshypotheticaldog · 22/06/2023 00:14

I always think the actual handmaidens were victims in the story. It was the Aunts who did the dirty work, they were the real misogynists. Aunt Lydia had this great line where she explained the 2 types of freedom, the freedom to and the freedom from. It gave me the shivers. Lydia and the other aunts were so sinister, because they were women. I am also baffled by M Attwood's stance. She predicted so much as a sort of horrible science fiction dystopia, but now that much of it has become reality she thinks it's fine? And we should all budge up and be kind?? It doesn't make any sense.
As for Glinner, I have no real opinion. I'm always suspicious of men claiming to be feminists. Maybe that's just my problem.

Yes! The handmaiden were constantly plotting against their masters. They hated it and could see what was happening. Handmaiden is more what a terf is. Female gender ideologists are the aunts or wives.

Waitwhat23 · 22/06/2023 07:41

I also don't think that I've seen a single tweet by Glinner where the replies aren't full with the deeply unpleasant, utterly predictable replies from TRA's of 'how's your wife' or similar. Margey on here does it as well - it's like a script.

I might not agree with everything Glinner says but that's the same for everyone.

And I don't use Handmaidens. I use Dick Panderers.

BezMills · 22/06/2023 07:44

I wouldn't use it, don't like it.

But I'm in not the Word Police and even if that was a thing I wouldn't join up.

TheGreatATuin · 22/06/2023 07:57

In a similar vein, does it not bother Mumsnet that Linehan's last ban was for making death threats towards a group of women?
Bullshit.
The whole 'boy who cried wolf' thing worked for a while, but it's not any more. We do go and check these things for ourselves.
Every single time I've seen a 'death threat' from the GC side, it's been either a tweet that has been taken in such bad faith that it bears no relation to what the person actually said or its been from a new account with no followers and suspicious AF.
Try making your case in good faith on things people have actually said. Maybe then we could get somewhere with this godawful mess.

TheGreatATuin · 22/06/2023 08:01

But back to the original question, I'm not a fan of 'handmaidens', because although it's a genuine term predating Atwood, the handmaids (and handmaidens historically) weren't given much choice. Its become too confused with Atwood and I think isn't the best term anyway.
Aunt Lydias would be far more accurate.
But I'm not going to denounce Glinner for it. He was one of the first to speak up and has been hugely punished for it. Maybe he doesn't always use the language I would, but so what? No one does that exactly, and his heart is in the right place. I have a lot of respect for him.

pues · 22/06/2023 08:03

Love Glinner. He can do no wrong and has sacrificed so much in his support for women.

RavingStone · 22/06/2023 08:07

I really like Dick Panderer too. You don't have to understand any cultural references to know what it means.

Unless dick means elbow or something in American?

Bosky · 22/06/2023 08:14

Mumsnet Feminist Womens Rights (FWR) aka "Feminism: Sex and Gender Discussions": where females who think anyone can be a man and males who think that anyone can be a woman come to complain about the way a male defends the sex-based rights of women and girls.

You couldn't make up this shit! 🙄

Kucinghitam · 22/06/2023 08:15

risefromyourgrave · 22/06/2023 07:10

I prefer the use of this picture when referring to women who put the wants of men above the needs and rights of women.

That's a very apt picture indeed.

RavingStone · 22/06/2023 08:15

I couldn't care less what language Glinner uses. Fuck conduct and fuck decorum. Fuck appealing to female socialisation and women being told they don't deserve rights because they asked for them the wrong way.

Glinner's actions speak louder and he is a principled, brilliant man. And brought us some of the best comedy I've ever seen.

Musomama1 · 22/06/2023 08:18

I think it's fair. It's also a lot nicer than terf!

Xoxoxoxoxoxox · 22/06/2023 08:35

No it doesn’t bother me, crack on Glinner!

Zodfa · 22/06/2023 08:49

I think it's a bit overused.

Interesting that there's a nasty word for women who are like this but not one for men who are just the same (that I can think of).

Flickersy · 22/06/2023 09:09

mirax · 22/06/2023 07:28

I dont share your concerns at all and many women, espcially the professional feminist organisations deserve worse names than handmaiden for what they have allied themselves to.

Ah, the good old "she deserved it" line. Interesting how that's perceived on here depending on whether you're rightthink or wrongthink.

RoyalCorgi · 22/06/2023 09:13

Glinner also uses "Vichy feminist", which I find both amusing and accurate.

Sometimes find Glinner's approach a bit blunt, but he's on the side of the angels, which is what matters.

Abhannmor · 22/06/2023 09:18

Waitwhat23 · 22/06/2023 07:41

I also don't think that I've seen a single tweet by Glinner where the replies aren't full with the deeply unpleasant, utterly predictable replies from TRA's of 'how's your wife' or similar. Margey on here does it as well - it's like a script.

I might not agree with everything Glinner says but that's the same for everyone.

And I don't use Handmaidens. I use Dick Panderers.

Yes , it seems to be their weapon of first resort now. I just block anyone who uses it , must be in 3 figures now.
I suppose they are more to be pitied but I'm getting compassion fatigue with these malignant creeps.

Sausagenbacon · 22/06/2023 09:20

Sorry to repeat what 99% of posters are saying, but I'll save my dislike for the women who, yes, ARE handmaidens (like my Labour MP). GL has sacrificed a lot in the cause, and I'm grateful to see a public figure who has some backbone.

CorruptedCauldron · 22/06/2023 09:20

Zodfa · 22/06/2023 08:49

I think it's a bit overused.

Interesting that there's a nasty word for women who are like this but not one for men who are just the same (that I can think of).

Bearded woke-bro?

Not sure how I feel about the term ‘handmaiden’ but Glinner is a valuable ally regardless.

lechiffre55 · 22/06/2023 09:23

Its such an amazing degree of hypocrisy that a group would go after Glinner's income so rabidly using fear to make sure no one will work with him in his industry then complain that he needs to use a paywall to try and scrape by on a meager income.
The no debate mantra has fallen. It is dead. The people who purposfully chose to build their house of cards on the swampy foundations of circular thought terminating cliches and no debate have suceeded only in excluding themselves from any adult conversation, and are now wondering why debate is now happening without them despite their incessantly agressive perpetual tantrum.
The hypocrisy of calling Glinner on "no debate" because you refuse to pony up £30 is breathtaking. Just stunning. "I won't pay, and so I can't harangue him. How mean is that?"
Your side could have debated at any point. If you had debated in good faith from the start, we would all have got a vastly better result. You would have a say where we as a society heads next out of this conflagration, and help choose the end destination together. It would have been achieved with input and consent from all sides, and been conducted in a mutually respectful way. But like a small spoilt child wriggling around and screaming their lungs out on the floor of McDonalds having a tantrum while everyone else watches on in bemusment because mummy won't and literally can't give you the big colourful Ronald McDonald clownman advertising cutout hanging from the ceiling, the situation has reached the point of moving on from mollifying and appeasing you to the adults stepping up and taking control of you and your appalling embarassing behaviour.
You can sulk and whinge as much as you like but you blew it bigtime and the adults are now moving on without you. All that's left is the amusment and grattitude that their kids are nothing like "that kid" in the bystanders who witnessed the spectacular performance of The Theatre Of Victimhood Extravagance. Ohh and funny stories about "that crazy spolit kid in McDonalds" to tell other parents when they get home. The internet is forever don't forget. This is the legacy you chose and built for yourselves.
Politicians are often the least in touch with reality. When it finally reaches them you know that everyone knows.

Sausagenbacon · 22/06/2023 09:30

Great Post leChiffre
Politicians are often the least in touch with reality. When it finally reaches them you know that everyone knows.
Yes, seeing Jess Phillips come out of weasel mode at the recent debate shows how the wind is blowing.