Sorry to say, the only demonstration here is of your own lack of ability to think critically. And your own prejudice.
Your prejudice if it as represented in your posts are some of the deepest that I have seen on MN. So I would hope it is all just performance or your adopted style of writing and not reality.
I guess if you applied your very same logic to all conferences and protests,
I imagine that Labour Party speakers at any conference could be called some kind of slur because there will be people in the audience who are considered that slur and will get photos taken.
Imagine what any sportsperson could be called. Blimey! Imagine those LGBT spokespeople’s list of slurs.
Imagine any news reporter or gosh… any fucking person who worked with another for any reason.
All because you think guilt by association when it is someone with horrific views attending a conference that others speak at is a valid excuse to accuse someone of wrongdoing.
At least you admit you made the accusation because you read it somewhere and believed it without any further information. That says a lot about you and what you post.
It is like you have followed a script of saying all the things you have read on other platforms that you found a great ‘gotcha’, without ever scratching beyond the surface.