Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Anti-women Response from Caroline Lucas re: equality act

141 replies

greenpartyshame · 07/06/2023 18:02

Caroline Lucas is my MP, sadly (I did not used to think that). I wrote to her requesting that she support the clarification that 'sex' in the equality act refers to biological sex. Her response is disgusting and shameful and I will be telling her so. Anyone who votes for that party now is casting a vote against women. I'll post her full response.

OP posts:
Pallisers · 07/06/2023 23:18

We are living through a time of great cultural change when it comes to gender and nobody has all the answers yet.

So while we pretend to search for the answers we will prioritise trans women over women.

or maybe

We have carefully implemented this great cultural change and we don't appreciate any criticism from the likes of you

or maybe

We couldn't give a curse about the nuances of this one. Frankly, we are astonished that women aren't just putting up and shutting up like we expected and the sooner you do just this, the easier it will be for us to get back to the important work of running the patriarchy.

Tinysoxx · 07/06/2023 23:33

Caroline Lucas - if you or your party are reading this:
More and more public/school toilet blocks are becoming ‘gender neutral’ ie mixed sexed. Everyone (despite their ideologies) seems to realise this means doors have to be full length for privacy with no easy way of getting in a locked cubicle. In fact I have never come across a mixed sex toilet that isn’t. This change is putting lives at risk. The door gaps are there for a very important safety reason - for visibility in case people collapse behind them. There are several places my epileptic daughter is less safe now. Single sex toilets with the door gaps work for many disabled people and other vulnerable people, particularly women. You are making their lives more difficult and unsafe. After all, if anyone is feeling unwell at school/in town - where do you head to?

SunnyEgg · 08/06/2023 08:01

R4 just said she’s standing down so maybe she heard pp plee ;

SerotinaPickeler · 08/06/2023 08:08

WomanIsEnough · 07/06/2023 19:56

I joined the Green Party to be able to vote internally on this issue a few years back (unwaged so I felt they weren’t getting much money out of me) as I’d really like an environmental political group that actually campaigned on environmental issues. But feeling like there really is no point doing that as they are so hateful and single minded (which would be fine if it was single minded on green issues). Is there anyone still a member that can convince me there’s a point to remaining?

I also joined to try and help change the GP 'from the inside', as some MNetters were suggesting. But despite ongoing pleas to stay and do this I've had enough. If Caroline Lucas, who is after all supposed to be less batshit than her fellow members, can still produce spectacular batshittery as seen in her email copied above, then there is no hope. So no, no point in remaining!

NotHavingIt · 08/06/2023 08:13

The dignity and integrity of women never seems to be a consideration.

Are all of these people really so blind that they are not aware of the numbers and types of men who are idenetfying as women these days?

I simply don't understand the ignorance and the lack of awareness of our elected representatives.

WittynotPretty · 08/06/2023 08:28

It’s just been reported that Caroline Lucas is standing down at the next election as her constituency work is stopping her from concentrating on the climate crisis.

Redshoeblueshoe · 08/06/2023 08:41

My reaction to her standing down: Oh fuck, she'll be going straight to the HOL

ArabeIIaScott · 08/06/2023 08:57

SunnyEgg · 08/06/2023 08:01

R4 just said she’s standing down so maybe she heard pp plee ;

Ha, I feel all powerful. Told Caroline Lucas to fuck off, and lo ...

FigRollsAlly · 08/06/2023 09:06

Tinysoxx · 07/06/2023 23:33

Caroline Lucas - if you or your party are reading this:
More and more public/school toilet blocks are becoming ‘gender neutral’ ie mixed sexed. Everyone (despite their ideologies) seems to realise this means doors have to be full length for privacy with no easy way of getting in a locked cubicle. In fact I have never come across a mixed sex toilet that isn’t. This change is putting lives at risk. The door gaps are there for a very important safety reason - for visibility in case people collapse behind them. There are several places my epileptic daughter is less safe now. Single sex toilets with the door gaps work for many disabled people and other vulnerable people, particularly women. You are making their lives more difficult and unsafe. After all, if anyone is feeling unwell at school/in town - where do you head to?

💐 This is such an important point, I’m so sorry that you have to worry about this and that nobody in power seems to care.

TheBiologyStupid · 08/06/2023 09:17

Excellent that CL is leaving the HoC at the next election - I just hope that doesn't mean she's going to glue her arse to the red leather benches upstairs...

LoobiJee · 08/06/2023 09:19

greenpartyshame · 07/06/2023 22:32

It's not elegant. Far too opaquely anti-women to be elegant. My response was telling her to fuck off and I don't care whether it was elegantly put or not. She's a danger to women and a disgrace to her party.

For the record, your reply was absolutely top class, greenpartyshame. Laser like focus. No hyperbole. Superb.

BaronMunchausen · 08/06/2023 09:24

Putting “biological sex” into the law would also seem to be totally unworkable in real terms

In declaring that we can't tell if someone is male, Lucas effectively discards the basis of sex-based safeguarding. Totally.

sevenbyseven · 08/06/2023 09:40

"Putting “biological sex” into the law would also seem to be totally unworkable in real terms"

But "sex" in the equality act already means biological sex. This isn't a change, just a clarification. If she doesn't realise that, it demonstrates exactly why the clarification is needed.

Beowulfa · 08/06/2023 09:47

It is so hard to engage with politics when one of the few you thought had integrity ends up shitting on you.

OP, could you also send her the brilliant post about plurality from the viewpoint of a British Pakistani Muslkim (user name mummysomething) yesterday?

BaronMunchausen · 08/06/2023 09:48

BaronMunchausen · 08/06/2023 09:24

Putting “biological sex” into the law would also seem to be totally unworkable in real terms

In declaring that we can't tell if someone is male, Lucas effectively discards the basis of sex-based safeguarding. Totally.

The abolition of sex-based segregation and safeguarding is intrinsic to gender ideology, given that absolutely any man could actually be a woman.

It also requires women and girls to trust and believe men over and above their own eyes and instincts. Lucas knows that. It's what she's saying.

RealityFan · 08/06/2023 11:21

I've always contended, if this was just females transing to men, no way would this phenomenon have ingrained itself like Japanese Knotweed.

Can you even contemplate men bowing to transmen entering in greater and greater numbers into the boardroom, the golf club, the brothel, the ManOSphere online space, the sports pitch, the stag do, etc etc?

No fucking way.

There'd have been no XY version of Catherine Lucas or Lisa Nandy or Ash Sarkar who would have told XYs to suck it up, move over.

No male dominated leftist parties or trade unions or media cabals that would have forced men to accept that TMAM.

On the other hand, TWAW...

SunnyEgg · 08/06/2023 11:24

BaronMunchausen · 08/06/2023 09:48

The abolition of sex-based segregation and safeguarding is intrinsic to gender ideology, given that absolutely any man could actually be a woman.

It also requires women and girls to trust and believe men over and above their own eyes and instincts. Lucas knows that. It's what she's saying.

Yep. She’s asking women to not see a male no matter what in any space, and any male can enter at will

nilsmousehammer · 08/06/2023 14:21

She in fact sees the duty of women to service provide for men at their own expense, without protest.

Binary, sex based prejudice. It is male supremacism.

nilsmousehammer · 08/06/2023 14:22

Which she is excusing to herself by repeating the Hail Mary that they're WOMEN, they're WOMEN, they're not men at all.... because if they were men this would be FUBAR.

EpicChaos · 08/06/2023 14:30

About time she exited the HOC/politics one way or another. I hope she doesn't end up in the lords!
Perhaps @greenpartyshame should send her a link to the ' skirt goes spinny ' documentary, ' What Is A Woman - Wrong Answers Only ' , though no doubt she'd report you for sending her porn, or something!
Great documentary though, so worth a watch but don't watch it near kids, is my advice.

maltravers · 08/06/2023 16:59

Someone like Caroline Lucas must have worked it out, but it’s expedient to sacrifice women. I voted Green last time (wouldn’t vote for Corbyn or Johnson, concerned over the environment). I finally cancelled my Green Party membership a few days ago because the head of the women’s group is campaigning against the clarification of “sex” in the equality legislation. The Greens are obsessed with this when they should be focussing on saving the planet. I’ve told them this and that while trans people deserve and have protection, so should women too. Shame on them the judases.

StrugglingWeight · 08/06/2023 17:26

RealityFan · 07/06/2023 22:59

I'm equally aggravated by this as the consensus here.

However it's exactly what I'd expect from her, she's laid out in great detail the new elites consensus view here.

Caroline sees no difference between women and transwomen, none at all.

All she sees are transwomen at a disadvantage, both from discriminatory natal men, and natal women who won't budge up and share their space/definition.

The intersectional analysis is that GC women are discriminatory by even raising an objection to inclusion.

For me, the EHRC debate is the pivotal one in this parliament.

We'll finally see what we're up against.

She clearly does see a difference between transwomen and women, hence why she's only capable of listening to one

It's the same as people who talk about not caring if people are blue/green. Pretending there isn't a difference helps no one

Florissante · 08/06/2023 17:57

IamRoyFuckingKent · 07/06/2023 19:12

Well she can fuck the fuck off and when she gets there she can fuck off some more

Yes.

HadEnoughSoTired · 08/06/2023 18:07

IamRoyFuckingKent · 07/06/2023 19:12

Well she can fuck the fuck off and when she gets there she can fuck off some more

I think she heard you... 😱