Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Anti-women Response from Caroline Lucas re: equality act

141 replies

greenpartyshame · 07/06/2023 18:02

Caroline Lucas is my MP, sadly (I did not used to think that). I wrote to her requesting that she support the clarification that 'sex' in the equality act refers to biological sex. Her response is disgusting and shameful and I will be telling her so. Anyone who votes for that party now is casting a vote against women. I'll post her full response.

OP posts:
nilsmousehammer · 09/06/2023 14:23

zibzibara · 09/06/2023 11:06

I don't consider these sort of politicians left-wing any more. They're something else entirely. I'm certainly not going to change my actual leftist views to whatever crap these idiots keep coming up with.

Yes. I think that about nails where I am.

Oh for an actually centre left party, rather than a bunch of nutjobs who quite like the image of identifying as one.

Undercoverknitter · 10/06/2023 00:48

MargotBamborough · 08/06/2023 21:12

Caroline Lucas is really disappointing.

She's been such a force for good in Parliament on many issues and I do genuinely believe that she's one of the few politicians who are there trying to make the country and the world a better place, rather than because they are a power hungry ego maniac.

I don't get WHY people like her have taken this position.

Yes, yes, be kind, whatever. I get why you could agree that TWAW as a starting point because you think it's just about being nice to a vulnerable minority and haven't really thought about the potential issues arising out of that.

But these left wing politicians have had it pointed out to them thousands of times now. They know about Karen White and Isla Bryson and Laurel Hubbard and Emily Bridges.

I'm absolutely certain that Caroline Lucas knows about Sarah Summers and the absence of single sex rape crisis support services in Brighton.

Why are they continuing to uncritically support this ideology?

I feel the same way. I've always rated Lucas as a force for good. There's no one else like her. I've always voted green as a protest vote in a tory safe seat, but not since her party's been turned inside out by this issue.

I had hoped she was lying low on this topic, to let the issue burn itself out and try to preserve what's left of her party, but it seems she's firmly in the other camp. A tiny part of me holds hope she's just been bogged down in her priority areas of environmental issues and simply, but unwisely, just taken advice from others in towing the party line on this, for the sake of holding it together.

She needs peaking, she'd be awesome to have onside.

Boomboom22 · 10/06/2023 22:35

She's always been mad tbf, Brighton hasn't exactly been helped by her party in Central or local gov!

BloodyHellKen · 12/06/2023 09:38

nilsmousehammer · 07/06/2023 20:05

The whole whining about 'you think they're a threat when they're lovely' (apart from the ones waving swords, sticking used tampons up their bums, taking selfies of their excitement with women in a loo <gibber> and videoing themselves wanking in cubicles when excitement gets overwhelming) totally avoids the bigger point.

It doesn't matter how lovely a male is. Some females have to walk out when they enter because they cannot use a mixed sex space

So if you're behind men using their preferred, happy choice that affirms their inner selves, you believe fuck inclusion, diversity and equality for women so menz can get nice self affirmation. That some women should have nothing so that men get choice,

No male walking into a women's space is 'lovely' when they are consciously excluding women and telling them they don't matter because lesser humans.

And that way bloody madness lies. And she'd only better hope that someone nastier than she is stupid uses her propped up 'some people are subhuman and that's ok' against people she cares about in the future. Because she'll only have hope, she'll have fucked the mechanisms that ensured this couldn't happen. Hoist by own petard will come.

@nilsmousehammer Well said 👏

Feministwoman · 13/06/2023 20:43

WomanIsEnough · 07/06/2023 19:56

I joined the Green Party to be able to vote internally on this issue a few years back (unwaged so I felt they weren’t getting much money out of me) as I’d really like an environmental political group that actually campaigned on environmental issues. But feeling like there really is no point doing that as they are so hateful and single minded (which would be fine if it was single minded on green issues). Is there anyone still a member that can convince me there’s a point to remaining?

I'm still hanging on by a thread, trying (along with a lot of other GP Women) to turn the ship around.
It's very demoralising to know that CL doesn't care about Women ( the real sort)

LoveMyBusPass · 14/06/2023 10:15

For years, Caroline has trodden her own path. I was hoping, following her decision to stand down, that she would get a backbone and start to talk some sense on the gender debate. I am dumbfounded and feel massively let down that when she finally came down off that uncomfortable fence, she landed firmly on the wrong side.
I am still full of admiration for many, or even most, of the things that she has done in her long and impressive political life, but this is a deal breaker for me. Nothing about women, just a gratuitous cis- thrown in.

There is a big, sensible, sisterhood in the Green Party, but we won't be welcoming Caroline into it any time soon.

greenpartyshame · 28/06/2023 22:28

I got another reply from Caroline today:

Thank you for your further message - I have carefully read the further points you raise.

I don’t agree with the way you have characterised my position. Trans rights is often called a ‘wedge’ issue and is all too often exploited as such. I therefore try hard to push back against it being used to create division, especially between long excluded and disadvantaged groups who have more to gain by standing together. As a long term and committed women’s rights campaigner, I recognise that Trans people and women both face serious harassment and persecution. Trans people are not at the root of the patriarchy or the associated violence against women and girls, and I will continue to champion universal human rights as well as to call out those people in positions of power who are are stoking up culture wars.

Whilst we have a difference of opinion on this, please be assured that I will continue to give your emails my full attention and to do my utmost to remain open minded and informed by the evidence.

Best wishes, Caroline

Caroline Lucas, MP for Brighton Pavilion
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA

OP posts:
greenpartyshame · 28/06/2023 22:28

This is what I sent back:

I again disagree with you. Women can stand in solidarity with trans people, as they can with any other oppressed group. That does not mean that women do not need specific protections and that there should be no specific protections for specific oppressed groups. Women do not have anything to gain by the category of woman being expanded to include males, as the assault on women's sports, the housing of males in women's prisons and the removal of single-sex trauma supports evidences. To allow these things to take place, and to suggest that women who object are the problem, is an act of patriarchal violence.

One does not have to believe that trans people are at the root of patriarchy or the associated violence against women an girls to believe that those women and girls deserve protections. The patriarchy makes assumptions about women and relegates them to second-class positions on account of their biology. When oppression is being enacted on the basis of biology, protections also should be.

You say you will be informed by the evidence. I am not clever enough to summarise the evidence well but would suggest you read Material Girl by Kathleen Stock who does it very well. You could choose to consider how she was abused in her own community for believing that biological sex is sometimes the highest context marker and for subjecting gender ideology to the same rigorous grilling which all other ideologies expect. You could consider whether it is fair to her to spin the issue as simply about a culture war. As a sexual abuse survivor, the only evidence I can specifically offer is to tell you that I feel unsafe in healthcare settings now because if I ask for a woman for intimate services, I may be offered a man and called a bigot if I object. I am scared to be an inpatient again because we have no single sex wards. I have no hidden agenda. I am not exploiting any issues. I simply want to feel safe and to know that the powers that be support my right to dignity and to recovery.

OP posts:
TheBiologyStupid · 28/06/2023 22:38

Another brilliant response, @greenpartyshame. Your persistence is commendable, too!

JulieHoney · 28/06/2023 22:55

@greenpartyshame , that is a wise, eloquent and compassionate rebuttal to her email.

I admire your courage and dedication, and would be proud to call you my sister.

Undercoverknitter · 28/06/2023 23:14

Yes, agree. 👏

It's motivated me actually to write to her myself. She's been the voice of reason to me over many issues, and I have always voted green as in a tory safe seat area. But not for the last few years due to this issue.

BloodyHellKen · 29/06/2023 09:58

I have nothing to add other than your response is magnificent. It is eloquent and gets the message across so very well. Thank you@greenpartyshame

ArabeIIaScott · 29/06/2023 10:03

Well done, greenpartyshame, that's a really measured and considerate response.

Redshoeblueshoe · 29/06/2023 10:35

Excellent reponse

IcakethereforeIam · 29/06/2023 10:40

Brilliant. It should make her think, you've neatly countered her position.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page