Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"I don't give a shit about the scientific explanations. If they identify as a women, they get to compete in sports"

306 replies

EdgeOfACoin · 29/05/2023 07:17

Emma Vigeland, presenter on The Majority Report, a "progressive" internet talk radio programme and podcast, has made it crystal clear that gender identity trumps fairness when it comes to sport.

Unfortunately I'm not tech savvy enough to clip the relevant section from the show directly, but plenty of other have, including Triggernometry presenter Konstantin Kisin, who Tweeted about it. You can see the video on his Twitter page:

https://twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1662390264005120001?t=3-gYh1LvSAt93Fh1N68boA&s=19

Emma has not backed down from her comments and has since mocked "terfs" for being "triggered" by her, declaring that "gender affirming care" for minors would solve all of the problems anyway:

https://twitter.com/EmmaVigeland/status/1662491715352010752

Emma has unequivocally declared that she is right on this issue.

Fascinating to see any pretence that the subject is "complicated" has gone - no, if a person with a penis wants to compete in women's sports, then that takes priority over everything else, including fairness.

As a side note, she used to be a presenter on The Young Turks and made a (very) half-hearted attempt to defend her former colleague Ana Kasparian last month after Ana lost patience with being referred to as a "birthing person". (Interestingly, Ana hasn't retreated from her own comments either.)

https://twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1662390264005120001?s=19&t=3-gYh1LvSAt93Fh1N68boA

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
literalviolence · 29/05/2023 10:02

Well at least she's honest, if oblivious to her internalised misogyny. I do prefer it when people can lay their cards on the table - hopefully this will help people ignore their opinions in any sensible debate.

Zodfa · 29/05/2023 10:04

What do these people think is the point of sex segregation in sport?

EdgeOfACoin · 29/05/2023 10:06

I think the video also makes clear that when people say there is no conflict between trans rights and women's rights, they are lying.

Emma knows there is a conflict. She just doesn't care

OP posts:
MargotBamborough · 29/05/2023 10:20

FrancescaContini · 29/05/2023 09:13

Thank you for the video clip. It made me laugh actually - she’s channeling her inner Verruca Salt. Classic case of someone who has no valid points to make who just raises her voice, swears and starts sounding aggressive.

She’s very immature and is embarrassing to watch. Own goal, I’d say 👌

At least Verruca Salt was obnoxiously demanding things she wanted for herself, rather than things a random group of other people want just because it's currently trendy to be seen to support them.

Being a spoiled brat was working pretty well for Verucca Salt until she met Willy Wonka, so there was a point to it.

I'd rather be a spoiled brat on my own account, rather than for the benefit of a group of spoiled brats which doesn't even include me.

Embarrassing.

SinnerBoy · 29/05/2023 10:22

I think that Emma, along with a number of other gender ideologues, has realised that they haven't just lost the science argument, they've been comprehensively trounced.

Realising that it's a waste of their time and energy to pretend that science "proves" that TWAW and have zero advantage, they've gone for the gang kicking, "Shut up and fuck off, we WILL have our way, you Nazis!" option.

Hopefully, this will get a lot of publicity, so that all relatively sane and normal people will be able to see that they're howling loonies.

Farmageddon · 29/05/2023 10:23

Righthandcider · 29/05/2023 09:05

Let's say the world decides Emma's right. Women's sports are open to bio males.
A sufficient number of male athletes identify their way in to make participation pointless for actual women.
Women's sports dwindle and the chaps lose their chance to "shine".
What will Emma do then? Support a campaign to compel women to compete against men for their gratification and affirmation?
Perhaps there will be prison-like facilities where female athletes are detained and forced to compete against men.

I have a feeling people like her would just shrug her shoulders and say 'ah well, the women just aren't good enough to compete then', which would be a bit like me competing against the under 10's in an egg and spoon race, and when I win by a country mile just saying 'I guess those pesky kids just need to train harder'.

WeeBisom · 29/05/2023 10:30

As other people have said it’s actually refreshing to see the cards on the table for once. Fairness doesn’t matter, women’s sports don’t really matter in fact . Males get what they want. One of the reasons I think the trans shit has taken hold so quickly is because many women are incapable of standing up for their own interests. When Rachel dilezal tentatively tried to make trans race a thing, the reaction from the black community was a resounding “no”. I just find it fascinating that a woman is willing to throw away the entirety of women’s sports for males.

Ofcourseshecan · 29/05/2023 10:34

MargotBamborough · 29/05/2023 09:34

I have a suggestion.

Since the sex/gender issue is apparently so controversial, let's abolish the men's and women's categories in sport and compete according to star sign instead. This seems like a sensible compromise because star sign is a non physical characteristic not related to biological sex, which should please the gender ideologues, but it is objectively verifiable and prevents people from trying to game the system by self identifying into a different category, which should please the rest of us. It also means twelve opportunities to win at each sport, rather than two.

For the next five years, including the Paris Olympics, all sporting competitions are organised according to star sign. Then we evaluate how it's gone.

And if competitors of the male biological sex have won in almost every category, society might accept that there was a good reason why we traditionally competed according to biological sex in the first place.

This, 100%!

Farmageddon · 29/05/2023 10:41

WeeBisom · 29/05/2023 10:30

As other people have said it’s actually refreshing to see the cards on the table for once. Fairness doesn’t matter, women’s sports don’t really matter in fact . Males get what they want. One of the reasons I think the trans shit has taken hold so quickly is because many women are incapable of standing up for their own interests. When Rachel dilezal tentatively tried to make trans race a thing, the reaction from the black community was a resounding “no”. I just find it fascinating that a woman is willing to throw away the entirety of women’s sports for males.

Yes, exactly! There is no way this shit would have gotten so far so quickly if it disadvantaged men the way it does women and girls - it would have been quashed immediately.

Even one of the guys from the Yogyakarta principles (on which a lot of the Self ID legislation is based) admitted recently that they never even considered the impact this would have on women when it was being considered.

Well why the fuck not? We're only half the population FFS. Only we're the half that have always been an afterthought. And because it is mostly men in prominent positions and they don't even consider us.

Plus we have ridiculous handmaidens like Emma Vigeland doing a their job for them.

Why are women so bad at supporting each other? It's like many younger women are embarrassed to stand up for female things, in case they are labelled a smelly, uncool feminist.

Truthlikeness · 29/05/2023 10:42

Righthandcider · 29/05/2023 09:05

Let's say the world decides Emma's right. Women's sports are open to bio males.
A sufficient number of male athletes identify their way in to make participation pointless for actual women.
Women's sports dwindle and the chaps lose their chance to "shine".
What will Emma do then? Support a campaign to compel women to compete against men for their gratification and affirmation?
Perhaps there will be prison-like facilities where female athletes are detained and forced to compete against men.

This was where my thinking was also going. She can decide inclusion is her number one aim but she can't force women to compete against males, unless she actually forces women to compete against males. Not very progressive...

PermanentTemporary · 29/05/2023 10:44

The male person who competed in the Cambridge University reserve rowing crew in 2015 apparently now identifies as nonbinary. It was painful for me to read about them because i was in that squad years ago at the very borderline - one male body would have excluded me, which would have meant a very different life path.

Emma's statement doesn't mention what she thinks should happen for those identifying as nonbinary. I wonder if on reflection she would say that having an open category would be positive for everyone - whatever she thinks about the female category. In which case there is at least a small area of common ground here to build on.

Helleofabore · 29/05/2023 11:00

I think the issue of non-binary throws the spotlight on the inanity of the demands. I think the creation of the NB categories and what is happening there has shown the issue clearly. It is almost like they didn’t think that through. Or they honestly feel that a male athlete with the ranking of 50 something SHOULD be celebrated as equal to the male and female winners and that the rest of the world will go along with it. Why are all the other groups petitioning for their equal payments?

And why didn’t they create NB category as a trans category so all trans people can enter? If there is enough entrants for the NB category, it should have included all trans people.

PermanentTemporary · 29/05/2023 11:04

Im absolutely not a fan of third categories for trans people as to me that's genuinely exclusionary and also disadvantages female transmen, meaning women get shat on again. Trans people aren't a different species - I'm coming at this from the angle that thinks gender is supremely trivial, on a par with your favourite biscuit, while sport is life or death 😄. There are people who think the opposite and I'm not going to change their views. How do we get everyone to manage to live together? An open category is one step in that direction.

MargotBamborough · 29/05/2023 11:06

Farmageddon · 29/05/2023 10:23

I have a feeling people like her would just shrug her shoulders and say 'ah well, the women just aren't good enough to compete then', which would be a bit like me competing against the under 10's in an egg and spoon race, and when I win by a country mile just saying 'I guess those pesky kids just need to train harder'.

Women need to play these people at their own game and demand AFAB and AMAB non binary categories.

Then all the female athletes compete as AFAB non binary.

BCBird · 29/05/2023 11:08

Wonder what future generations will make of this sh*t show.

RufustheSpecuIatingreindeer · 29/05/2023 11:24

Im absolutely not a fan of third categories for trans people

im a fan in as much as it being a gender neutral category open to all, same with third toilets

alternatively I would be happy with female and open categories in sports…and toilets to be fair 🤔

MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 29/05/2023 11:25

literalviolence · 29/05/2023 10:02

Well at least she's honest, if oblivious to her internalised misogyny. I do prefer it when people can lay their cards on the table - hopefully this will help people ignore their opinions in any sensible debate.

Agree. And at least it's an intellectually coherent position ("I'm aware women may be disadvantaged, but I think inclusion is more important"), rather than straight-up denying the advantages that men have. Some of the replies are even more disturbing, IMO, because they deny reality and claim that it's misogyny to say that women are not as strong as men.

endofthelinefinally · 29/05/2023 11:28

PermanentTemporary · 29/05/2023 09:21

I think it's fine. That's her priority, inclusion of trans people in their preferred gender over sex-based fairness. She doesn't think women as a sex matter at all, gender is more important.

I think it's profoundly wrong. But it's actually preferable to 'ooh it's complicated, let's do more research' which is just silly, and also fails to acknowledge that the change in the rules was made on the basis of a single study of 8 people, ie a figleaf, so that the pro-women group could become the group trying to make a difficult political change against the odds.

I do also acknowledge the political and cultural environment in the US. Not only that the right-wing powers who have picked up this as a cultural issue are theocratic and only care about women as breeding stock. Also that commercial medicalisation is so normal in the US - 65% of the population are on at least one prescription drug. Over here its 25%. They simply have been commercially trained to regard popping pills as normal.

And those will be the people with health insurance. Many Americans don't get the medication they need.

Farmageddon · 29/05/2023 11:28

Helleofabore · 29/05/2023 11:00

I think the issue of non-binary throws the spotlight on the inanity of the demands. I think the creation of the NB categories and what is happening there has shown the issue clearly. It is almost like they didn’t think that through. Or they honestly feel that a male athlete with the ranking of 50 something SHOULD be celebrated as equal to the male and female winners and that the rest of the world will go along with it. Why are all the other groups petitioning for their equal payments?

And why didn’t they create NB category as a trans category so all trans people can enter? If there is enough entrants for the NB category, it should have included all trans people.

Didn'y the first person in the US who got Non Binary on his passport admit a few years later it was all bullshit? I watched an interview with him and he was sort of laughing at the ridiculousness of it all (he also admitted that he was actually an autogynephile).

But the authorities were busy celebrating their 'inclusiveness' of it all.

Farmageddon · 29/05/2023 11:28

*Didn't

inamarina · 29/05/2023 11:33

FrancescaContini · 29/05/2023 09:27

Absolutely. These quaint Victorian-era euphemisms (“top surgery”) need to be replaced with real medical terminology.

We use proper terminology for every other medical procedure a person could possibly need - bowel re-section / abortion / foot amputation etc - so why the coyness around “double mastectomy” etc, I wonder? Could it be that some people want to make it sound as easy as getting your toenails clipped? If so, WHY do they want to make it sound so easy? 🤔🤫🤫

Answers on a postcard, please.

Agree. Top/ bottom surgery sound so casual, nothing to see here.
Like a little tweak needed for the person to finally feel comfortable in their body, similar to a nose job perhaps, or lip injections, not the major surgery it actually is.
So much easier to get more people to support this idea if you give the procedure an inoffensive name and claim it’s a crucial part of „healthcare“.

Fighterofthenightman1 · 29/05/2023 11:39

I still don't understand the satisfaction these bio males get from coming first and smashing records in a woman's category? There's no competition, they know they're going to win, where's the sense of achievement? There isn't any!

Hidinginaonesie · 29/05/2023 11:41

Fighterofthenightman1 · 29/05/2023 11:39

I still don't understand the satisfaction these bio males get from coming first and smashing records in a woman's category? There's no competition, they know they're going to win, where's the sense of achievement? There isn't any!

Money, fame, sponsorship.
I can see why they do it (at the expense of any pride), what I can’t understand is how it’s been allowed to happen!

inamarina · 29/05/2023 11:43

Hidinginaonesie · 29/05/2023 11:41

Money, fame, sponsorship.
I can see why they do it (at the expense of any pride), what I can’t understand is how it’s been allowed to happen!

I also don’t understand biological women supporting the whole thing.

Hidinginaonesie · 29/05/2023 11:43

I’m wondering how long it’ll be before people start identifying as disabled.

Swipe left for the next trending thread