Antipodean fruit growers 3 - Is the Kiwi a Dodo or a Phoenix?

[Bosky]

Continuation thread from Antipodean fruit growers 2 - Canary in the internet coal mine
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4632616-antipodean-fruit-growers-2-canary-in-the-internet-coal-mine

Front row seat on the seemingly eternal battle between Jersh (aka Suzi Quatro's Fat Nan) and his Merry Band of Farmers against the Transpowered Forces of Internet Censorship.

1st Thread - Antipodean fruit grower statement
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4620584-antipodean-fruit-grower-statement

god you lot are so much more patient than me. I'd got as far as typing "'FWR' isn't one person you absolute weirdo"

I accept that your approach is probably more productive than mine

Didn't you find BMEZINE and Rotten shocking?

I know very well what they are. People who choose to modify their bodies being mocked- can't really see a huge issue unless they're vulnerable.

Rotten - wouldn't you agree that providing graphjc violence like that all in one place had nothing but a negative impact?

I still don't think either of those is as bad as threatening to rape & dismember someone.

BMEZINE was people sharing their own body mods with other likeminded people, no mocking. I didn’t find it shocking because I was an adult and I already knew that world pretty well, albeit I’ve always been more involved with the tattoo side of it rather than the tongue splitting or modern fakir hook-hanging stuff.

Rotten wasn’t my personal idea of a good time but no, I didn’t find it particularly shocking (but then a lot of the material shared was historical, rather than happening in real time). Also, it was all still images back then and most of the material came from crime scene investigations or foreign press (I was shocked that images that I saw via Rotten were published on the front pages of mainstream tabloid news papers in various South American countries though, because obvs kids can see newsstands).

The problem with exposing minors to graphic or adult material is it shapes how their brains develop.

I was about to post similar. This poster seems oddly invested in shit posting about KF and just asking a question here when their questions would be better posted on KF.

Well doesn't mean they're necessarily positive about gay people...Considering their content is often disgusting and 'car crash' type stuff, doesn't this just mean they're watching as a gross-out?

I don't know the thought processes of the people watching. You could always ask them.

You're answering a post from last December.

Just go to KF and have a look around since you're clearly extremely interested in what's there. This is FWR not the KF information bureau.

Ffs. A post from nearly a year ago resurrected? You really are trawling here aren't you.

How does a wide-eyed innocent like you who apparently knows nothing about KF know that the content is "disgusting" or a "car crash"?

You're getting tedious now.

If you want to know what's on KF go and look. Otherwise, maybe get a life and stop with the disingenuous bollocks eh?

The fascination w people like Chris Chan does seem to fall under 'gross-out', esp some of the things KF users asked him to do. I understand the site has somewhat moved kn since that era though, according to people here.

You seem to be a bit obsessed by Chris Chan.

Read it, don’t read it, campaign for its removal, whatever. It’s nothing to do with anyone here.

God, this is such a ridiculous comment that is always trotted out on this type of thread.
I mean, this is literally a thread about them, so why shouldn't someone ask a question about the thread topic?!
If it's not complete group think responses, it's feigning innocence and dumbness "wah, we're not their mum, why not ask them?"
Or "we're all just little mummies on here, what would we know?!" 🙄

You found know @TheJoyOfWriting you can go to KF and ask Josh all these questions. He may even answer you. Why are you so invested in KF? Are you Josh’s mum and this is an attempt at an advertising campaign? It’s a novel concept I grant you.

Why are you so invested in KF?
Bit rich on a thread of going on for a thousand comments and 40 pages (and it's thread 3 of them... )

I've mentioned him repeatedly bc it's arguably the worst thing KF have been accused of bc it's the most verifiable. Wasn't the site set up in the first place to harass him?

I’m just on this thread to make sure I get invited to the KF/Mumsnet mixer. I’m just confused as to why one poster is spamming the thread with naive “facts” about KF the fact this is thread 3 kind of suggests the people on it are well aware of the nature of KF.

they're not asking about KF particularly though are they? they're asking tedious faux naive questions about what posters on here think

Have they set a date for it yet? A Christmas one might be nice.

we're all just little mummies on here, what would we know?!

🤭🤡

I’ve not gone on KF for at least a couple of years. Might have to take another look and see what all this desperate bollocks is about 😊

@TheJoyOfWriting you mentioned the 'right to be forgotten'

That doesn't relate to the entire Internet 🤦‍♀️

No one has the right to have random crap they have posted about themselves / that is in the public domain forgotten. How do you think that would work wrt any other forum or social media site?

I think you're getting your GDPR training in a muddle...

Two posters who've been on MN for two weeks at most, similar username types and scoldy writing styles.

Total coincidence I'm sure.

Would you like us to send Josh to his room?

I wonder if the PP has realised that they've probably increased traffic to the site 😁

😂🙄