I initially assumed that The Disinformation Project would be scientific, y’know, like the expert witnesses giving evidence re: social media in the Depp/Heard US case, who used specialist software to crunch numbers of tweets and the reach of each tweet?
But it looks like TDP just scroll through social media looking for stuff they don’t personally like, and then write word salady reports referring to other people’s personal opinions as ‘Information Disorders’ as if having a different opinion to the government is an illness?
It’s a bit batshit Big Brother-y, frankly.
Plus, as that Charlie bloke says, TDP pivot their narrative so many times they end up turning in circles.