@EvilBee
I'm not being silly - please see attached where Stock said what she did and 'male people' i.e. what normal people call transsexual women, have used women's facilities for a long time. Do you think that Caroline Cossey was using the men's loos in the 70's and 80's?
You are being silly, or at least disingenous.
Firstly, the social contract pre-exists trans women using women's spaces. Which is obvious when you think about it, because if it didn't those spaces would not have existed for trans women to use.
Secondly, as I think I have already explained to you on another thread, the fact that consent may have been given, or at least not strongly protested, to the small number of physically transitioned trans women who started to use some female spaces in the later twentieth century does not mean that consent cannot be revoked today, when the impact of that is better understood, the number of trans women has greatly increased, the expectation of physical transition has gone, and the construction of trans identity has changed from a polite courtesy extended to accomodate someone "as" the opposite sex to an insistence they "are" the opposite sex and should gain all that sex's rights and resources as an absolute right regardless of their own behaviour.
By happy coincidence, I was around in the 70s and 80s, and a GNC child to boot. Yes, from time to time someone might say "son, that's the ladies" and I or my mum would say "I am a girl" and that was all. No one thought I was deliberately trying to be somewhere I should not be. I didn't like it happening because I was a bit bullied at school for not being appropriately girly, which is probably one of the reasons I've grown up gender critical and feminist, but I didn't feel personally attacked or shamed by it. If GNC people today are finding they are challenged more aggressively now than I was back then, I think we have to recognise that is the result of the creeping encroachment of male people into female resources that has happened since then.