I'm just reading the decision and the statements she was found guilty of having brought her profession into ill repute are nothing I would consider in any way offensive.
This is the first one, its an opinion that a woman should have the right to hold and express.
"Page 74 of Tab 4: This page contains the final paragraph of an online article which is reproduced in full at Tab 30 (pp. 276 – 278). The College maintains the statement “trans activists determined to infiltrate or destroy women-only spaces” at p. 74 is discriminatory because it suggests that transgender persons will destroy female spaces. The statement is made in the context of an article which addresses the Vancouver City Council’s decision to rescind an annual grant to the Vancouver Women’s Shelter because it refused to allow males who self-identify as women to access its services and shelter. The Respondent quotes from a Vancouver Women’s Shelter member and former client who described how the rape relief services changed her life.
The Respondent reports that the Vancouver Women’s Shelter plans to host its annual fundraiser, noting that many prominent feminists and allies have publicly offered support. She concludes by observing the Vancouver Women’s Shelter will “surely (and maddeningly) face continued backlash from trans activists determined to infiltrate or destroy women-only spaces. The women of VRR, however, are clearly up to the task”.
During the hearing, the Respondent testified she is not speaking about transgender people generally when she refers to trans activists:
A … sometimes I’ve said trans activists as well, which maybe as a side-note I would just mention I’ve been misinterpreted when I’ve said or criticized trans rights activists. I’m not speaking about trans people when I say that I’m speaking about the people that are activists for this cause, and who embrace gender ideology, and it’s – you know, it’s a movement that is infringing on the rights of women and pushing institutions to adopt what I believe are false and delusional beliefs about reality. And often this is a movement that has in my personal experience become extremely abusive towards women who speak out against it.
The Panel agrees with the College that the reference to trans activists infiltrating or destroying “women-only spaces” has a negative connotation of improper, illegal, aggressive, and destructive conduct. Although the statement is directed to “trans activists”, who may or may not be transgender persons, and the Respondent sought to distinguish transgender activists from transgender people generally in her evidence, the Panel finds that a reasonable person would associate those comments with members of the transgender community. The comment is discriminatory and derisive as it suggests all transgender activists will act in an improper and aggressive manner in attempting to infiltrate or destroy “women-only spaces” and derogatory to the extent it is designed to lower the standing of transgender persons in the community and elicit outrage and contempt. The Respondent is identified as a “registered nurse educator” in the footer to the online article. "
https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Decision-on-Verdict-March-13-2025.pdf?mc_cid=74250c43b1