You're making that up as you go along now. Just as you are overstating / misrepresenting some of what has been said here.
Explaining the reasons he did what he did is not doubling down and refusing to see anything.
I saw the original TRAs .in Manchester as threatening. I saw Mr Menno ridiculing them.
When it was suggested he was being racist I too explained the root of his appearance, piss taking M/TRAs. I didn't expect to be told "So what? It's still racist because the USUAL MN whitewash" etc etc.
I thought it was possible to be able to discuss it and see that whilst offence may have been caused it was not offered, not deliberate.
But no, any explanation, discussion, lack of immediate contrition is labelled racist and that is that.
OK. You have made your point. You have explained that it doesn't matter what anyone else thinks or says. I get it. We do not agree. Could you accept that we won't agree and move on? Or is that not good enough?