You made many points suggestions. However you have not established at all, that the connection which makes them analogous. At all.
You continue to ignore it and I don't know why.
Lesbians are not attempting to identify into a 'lower risk' group. They are females and they commit crime at a rate close to the female rate. I am sure there will be other groups of females that will commit sex crime at a rate commensurate with those lesbians you are attempting to force the analogy to fit with.
Do lesbians or any other female group commit sex crime at the same rate as male?
What other male sub group are you willing to consider to be in that same 'safe risk' zone you are attempting to persuade women to accept for transitioned males?
If there are underlying reasons why those transitioned males are committing crimes at rates that seem even higher than other males, why aren't lobby groups addressing that? Why are they instead seeking to deny it. And, if the statistics are lying, why aren't the lobby groups gathering information and publishing it to refute the other statistics?
So, your analogy doesn't work, you are accusing women of hate for your own agenda. You are not working with the lobby groups to address an issue that you recognise and frankly, we know may be an issue, but it is still not a reason to including males as females in statistics, reporting, and in prisons. And if they need their own safe spaces, campaign to get them.
But you are here avoiding the reasons why the collection and dissemination of the facts and the data is necessary.
Plus if you had actually bothered to read many of the threads where that study is posted, it is rarely used to support our arguments. It has a correlation, yes. But the thing is, we can use the current statistics of transitioned males who are in the UK prisons. And yes, we have seen it and discussed it at length. Plus, please do tell us suggestions exactly what mental health support is being given to males with gender dysphoria these days? You pointed it out here:
trans cohort group accessed more mental health care, which is appropriate given the level of ongoing discrimination the group faces. but it seems that there is now very little mental health care given. So, your own point seems to be again irrelevant for this era.
And suggestions, if you don't like those UK prison statistics then maybe you should actually go and work with those lobby groups to gather some robust data so that everyone will have very clear, unobfuscated data to work with?
Otherwise, women and women's groups will continue to collect the information and disseminate it until the push to lower the boundaries of safeguarding around this group has ceased and the myths as to their 'lower risk' is finally proven or disproven.