mummyrocks1 · Today 11:44
"As did JD , he's been found to be lying too. I am a southern gentleman- nope."
I don't think there's a set definition for being a Southern gentleman
"AH ruined my career- nope."
That is a matter of opinion, not of lies. It hardly helped his career when she made her allegations. It certainly led to him being dropped from the Fantastic Beasts franchise and almost certainly led to him being dropped by Disney. He's hardly the first difficult star and there is no Pirates without him. He is the franchise.
"AH cut my finger off- nope."
Your evidence that she didn't? She's on tape saying she didn't mean to hurt him when the doctor and nurse arrived on the scene
"I am not a monster/don't have black outs- nope."
Again, evidence that he is a monster, other than the word of Heard?
JD is also on tape being abusive and admitting violence along with other texts from others saying he was violent, a monster.
Monster was the word he used to describe his addictions and he's on tape calling her names in a mutual mud slinging episode. There's no evidence of him hitting her.
"JD also has a history of violence."
Not against women. He's broken things and got into a fight with a paparazzi and had a few bar fights when he was younger.
"All of this- except the dogs as I don't know the ins and outs of that. Can apply to both. Why is it one rule for JD and one for AH?"
There isn't. If I saw strong evidence of mutual abuse I would call it mutual abuse. I can believe he was hell to live with at times. He was obviously spinning out of control with drink and drugs (made much worse by being married to Heard of course) and has a jealous streak. He's no angel but other than calling her names and banging a few doors I see no strong evidence of him hitting her
"Also- I find it strange that she can't possibly have been abused because she is a liar and was a abuser. Can't she be all of those things? I believe she can lie, can be an abuser but also can be abused too. One does not make the other impossible. They are not mutually exclusive."
Absolutely. It could be mutual. The problem is the evidence of her abuse behaviour is stronger than his and she is obviously lying about her injuries among other things. That means it's hard to believe anything she says without strong, independent eye witnesses, which she doesn't have