Obviously I'm pleased about this but I don't know if we should call it a victory as such. Bridges and BC were found to have broken their own rules about eligibility. This is why UCI stepped in.
This doesn't mean Bridges won't get all the details in a row and return later in the year or next year.
Rules were broken but the rules allowing men to compete as women still stand as far as I can tell, Bridges and BC will just have to get their house in order next time.
The lack of contrition or remorse for what they are doing to female cyclists is absent from the statement nor is there any mention of women being included in this coalition. This leads me to conclude that unfairness to female cyclists wasn't really a factor in what happened here.