@Changelingbutonlyforme
I’m not saying that it’s possible for a person born male to become female. At all. I’m saying it’s a stronger argument in a situation where people will be picking holes in your logic to say that transwomen cannot become entirely like women from a biological point of view because Uterus, Chromosomes, likely already experienced male puberty etc. The problem with saying that people born biologically male forever remain biologically male is that the counter arguments are going to get messy. If your definition of ´male’ includes ´has male sex organs and produces sperm’ well, surgery can change that. But surgery can’t give a transwomen a functioning uterus and egg producing ovaries.
Relying on chromosomes as the defining biological characteristic is asking for a pointless and irrelevant debate about chromosomal abnormalities.
And my response was
Twaddle because I am passed caring about counter arguments, they too are twaddle.
We are in this mess because too many of us, me, politicians, others, people in general, tried to be understanding and polite. All that got us was men in women's prisons, sports etc.
There are no counter arguments.
Men are men
Women are women
Being trans doesn't change that reality. It just changes the social presentation of an individual. And that isn't problematic because who actually cares?
Trying to square that circle and to give a little actually enables the dismantling of safeguarding measures. Only women and girls have their safeguarding ignored. So no... I won't make any concession in the language and anyone trying to pick holes in my logic will be told to take their gender religion and anti scientific bollocks elsewhere.