[quote SolasAnla]@Blibbyblobby
No, thats it.
One tweet by JKR
He claims to be legally trained°.
He had a whole conversation with himself.
In theory it was about Scottish law.
His legal basis was fundamentally flawed.
He got spoon fed the legislation.
Still claimed the original basis was factual.
Began name calling.
Usual if you don't agree with me it's transphobic
Began name calling and blocking.
Disclosed that he used TERF as derogatory term.
He begins attempting to skew his legal basis to align with Scottish law.
Begins to use f as "emphases"
Tweets random defamation
Formulates usual Walter Mitty/ White Knight syndrome scenarios.
Usual want transwomen dead claim.
Claims victory in isolated tweet.
Drew that conclusion
I admit I have not read all of his tweets nor in chronological order. (Apparently he did not read the attached article, tbc)
He did construct some of his tweets to avoid direct defamation. That one may skate by in his court circuit.
But yes, that is his tweet.
°If he has any professional qualifications, the organisation should think about implementing some professional development training on ethics, (imo😉)[/quote]
As someone who followed Seth until this point I'm still stunned at this really. It's so daft I keep laughing but really it's not funny at all. His absolute insistence nobody knew what they were talking about and had no right to be tweeting about it (when he didn't either), the arrogance in inferring intentions from the clearest of tweets (including JKR's), the hysterical assertion that to disagree with him was to, erm, want all trans women dead, to say nothing of the deliberate obfuscation throughout.
I saw from Gia's timeline some tweets of his she'd highlighted have since been deleted, wonder if the whole display is still there.