Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Harrop MPTS Thread 3

1000 replies

BoreOfWhabylon · 25/11/2021 11:16

For when the last one fills up

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
RedDogsBeg · 29/11/2021 15:27

So it is someone who has had these confidential materials shared by one of these two people to be able to do this, and it is being done with the intent and purpose of punishing witnesses. And both Harrop and GP are bound by professional standards.

Yep, punish the women for speaking out and also deter others from doing so.

TRA's never fail to show their true colours and just how vindictive and women hating they are.

Glintwithpersperation · 29/11/2021 15:29

I don’t want him struck off, I want him signed up to an anti misogynistic ‘Prevent’ and, similar to violent domestic abusers, weekly counselling to explore his hatred of women / behaviour for as long as it takes (at least 1 year). All at his own expense. Any signs of anti terf spray badges / vile comments / mixing with his woman hating pals and he goes straight back to the beginning again.

Glintwithpersperation · 29/11/2021 15:31

Maybe it’s Ben Hunte? According to the article, he had all the documentation.

KittenKong · 29/11/2021 15:32

Hang on - so someone has been publishing witness statements?

PrawnofthePatriarchy · 29/11/2021 15:34

Very glad the tribunal has taken Harrop's conduct seriously.

LizzieSiddal · 29/11/2021 15:37

The police and the GMC need to be made aware of this. Witness intimidation is a crime.

nauticant · 29/11/2021 15:39

Yes, as well as linking the anonymised identities of the witnesses to their actual real world identities. But if you want to intervene, tread very carefully, some of the people involved are off-the-scale toxic obsessives.

Motorina · 29/11/2021 15:42

@Flixon

he will be erased from the medical register. In my mind there is no doubt
Vanishingly unlikely in relation to this hearing given that the GMC hasn't asked for it, and the panel have - at least from the screenshots I've seen - considered his conduct is remediable.
UncleTonyinahotpinkbrandbeanie · 29/11/2021 15:47

The tribunal cannot consider the leaking of the documents. This would need to be done in a separate process. How the documents were leaked would need to be investigated.

Witness Statements given to the MPTS are NOT public documents in the same way as they would be in a civil claim. One cannot simply apply to a tribunal for copies as you would with the civil courts. Bundles are not given out.

So whoever is claiming otherwise, doesn’t have as good a knowledge of the law as they would claim.

GenderApostatemk2 · 29/11/2021 15:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 29/11/2021 15:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Quotes deleted post

AlfonsoTheUnrepentant · 29/11/2021 15:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Quotes deleted post

nauticant · 29/11/2021 15:59

It's claims made on twitter. If there's enough discussion of those then this thread will be shut down.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 29/11/2021 16:01

Squirrel .... over there....

AlfonsoTheUnrepentant · 29/11/2021 16:01

I am always sceptical when someone who has no history in the feminism threads and little MN history makes a provocative post.

Ekofisk · 29/11/2021 16:02

It’s being alleged on the spurious Twitter account, I assume in the knowledge that that it will be repeated.

Maybe best to not to amplify things, I reckon this thread is being heavily monitored.

beastlyslumber · 29/11/2021 16:02

He ought to be struck off but unpaid suspension is also good. I can't see him mending his ways so presumably/hopefully a suspension will in effect be permament?

GenderApostatemk2 · 29/11/2021 16:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

BoreOfWhabylon · 29/11/2021 16:03

@GenderApostatemk2 please don't bring unsubstatiated rumours made by vicious twitter trolls to this thread.

OP posts:
AlfonsoTheUnrepentant · 29/11/2021 16:04

Thank you, @BoreOfWhabylon.

I don't want to see this thread derailed.

BoreOfWhabylon · 29/11/2021 16:08

Well, it's not my thread Alfonso. I just started it when we were running out on the previous one.

Many of us have asked again and again for other possible players in this drama not to be referred to here.

OP posts:
CompleteGinasaur · 29/11/2021 16:09

I'm comparatively new to MN. Are the attempted derails/shut downs always so clumsily obvious?

RedDogsBeg · 29/11/2021 16:10

@CompleteGinasaur

I'm comparatively new to MN. Are the attempted derails/shut downs always so clumsily obvious?
In a word, yes.
AlfonsoTheUnrepentant · 29/11/2021 16:11

Glad to see our visitor has been shown the door. Thank you, @MNHQ!

MonsignorMirth · 29/11/2021 16:14
Smile
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.