@ElectricCarbonara
What is birthingparents point?
Kathleen was intimidated at work to the point that she could no longer bear it and had to give up her job to escape it. Which was the intention of the intimidation.
Because this intimidation is being discussed by Kathleen does mimmybirthingparent think there hasn't been enough of it? It seems like the rage fest got it's desired result of her leaving the job and so it's moved onto horror that Kathleen is now talking about the intimidation.
Lorraine agreed that talking freely was the right thing to do.
I genuinely believe that smart, well educated, used-to-debate people can get the upper hand in any debate. Politicians do it all the time.
But personally, I don't understand how anyone could ever win a debate over this, given that it has the departure from reality as its premise.
But more than that, much, much more than that, even if your linguistic skills are giving you an advantage in a debate, the very nature of what you're arguing for is what I would like to be put into the public domain.
Even if you win or dominate, let's see what you claim is your prize.
Who on earth can remember the first person who said not all women have a cervix? But now, every politician, gets asked that.
Whatever Grace Lavery asserts, every politician, policymaker, pundit, will be asked whether they agree with it.
I couldn't give a toss about the likes of Lavery. I do care about who is writing prison policy, and putting children and men in the same changing room. And they have to agree with someone like Lavery, in order to do it. So let's all see exactly what Lavery thinks.