[quote R0wantrees]A Woman's Place is a safe port (Debbie Hayton, Liverpool, 25th September 2018)
transcript
(extracts)
"I'm a trans rights activist campaigning for trans people who do face less favourable treatment in the workplace... trans self-identification poses huge risks to transsexual people. At risk is the social acceptance we're built up in recent years and much of that is informal and based on trust... I'm speaking from a transsexual perspective and I use that word deliberately, transsexual. Some people will seem to think it's archaic and antediluvian, but for me it has meaning. It implies somebody who has who has made or intends to make a meaningful transition that has been driven by gender dysphoria" (continues)
"A third point was to say that self-identification risks the informal social acceptance that transsexual people have built up in recent years. There was a thread on Mumsnet that some of you might have read, that went on for about 700 posts and I read it, yeah. But that's that's what I mean, I predicted this two years ago. I wrote in my blog two years ago that we're risking this acceptance. I'm seeing with my own eyes and the reason is it's because people are concerned" (continues)
"We need to protect women and girls from male violence, oppression and intimidation and sex segregation is central to many safeguarding policies. How do you divide society if it's not strictly by biological sex?
Now for years transsexuals have been quietly included by women, either as a right if we have a GRC or by consent in many cases like in my own where there is no GRC. In real life women do include me in those spaces because they said they want me to be there.
But I suspect some in the room may think that this is an imposition and I see where people are coming from. I'm happy to debate this point in the pub later with people.
But what I would say is the gatekeeping involved in the medical reports within the present gender recognition act offer safeguards against abuse and reassures society. Sweep those safeguards away and we're left in different territory. If any male person can become a female person just because they say so then some will be tempted to do it for nefarious purposes.
I hear the argument that men wouldn't, wouldn't do that. Well I was a man for long enough to know that some men definitely would do that and that they're precisely the men that women need to worry about. And they're also the men that transsexuals need to worry about as well. Abusers will take opportunities wherever safeguarding is weakest and every time someone abuses the system then its our credibility that's being damaged. Women say how can I trust you?" (continues)
[/quote]
Well that's eye-opening. Good lord, it's wrong on almost every count, too.
Ray Blanchards typology divided transwomen into HSTS (homosexual transsexuals), and AGPs.
So was Hayton saying that he was a transsexual then? Despite now saying he's actually AGP?
As others have now perceived, it seems to be all about anticipating where the wind is going to blow.
Also being a prolific sex offender is absolutely no bar to getting a GRC. Either DH doesn't know that, in which case why the hell is he writing guidelines for schools, or he does know that and is being deceitful.
If any male person can become a female person just because they say so then some will be tempted to do it for nefarious purposes.
Surely accessing female only spaces because of a sexually motivated identity, is nefarious???