Gay men's magazine bullied into grovelling

[aliasundercover]

twitter.com/BoyzMagazine/status/1332052779871965186

Looks like they're gunning for gay men now. Anything other than complete agreement is no good.

Readers here will be used to this sort of insanity:
twitter.com/robholley/status/1332054419337334789
I wonder if it will wake up those who have not seen it before?

In that case jj you need to be careful how you word your posts to improve clarity

allmywhat

Great. Now I can't stop sniggering and the cats are staring at me!

In fact don't bother, all you do is lie and snipe and there doesn't seem much point engaging with you.

Datun is one of the most respected posters on FWR. You're not going to win many friends here with that attitude

Datun is one of the most respected posters on FWR. You're not going to win many friends here with that attitude

Heaven forbid ever disagree with, WTAF lol

accusing people of lying is not in the spirit

especially when they don't

you're welcome

See what happened to your last post jj1968?

It was deleted for making a personal attack.

You can have this happen to all of the posts that you're claiming are attacking you simply by pressing the report button.

Quaggars I don't think MNHQ permit people quoting personal attacks from posts that have been deleted and saying that they're true.

Especially when the quote is an easy to prove proven lie.

As I said to jj1968 please report personal attacks. MNHQ do delete them, as has just happened.

Making vague allegations about 'personal attacks' but not being able to identify exactly what they are is what posters sometimes do when they haven't got an argument to make.

See! Your post has just been zapped.

Just report any personal attacks, and MNHQ will take action, honestly.

Not all personal attacks do get zapped though.
What about the ones that insinuate things about a posters sex life like on this thread and then when person questions it - get told "stop it, no-one asked?" and that they're imagining things - so it definitely seems OK for that to be allowed to happen.

@Quaagars

Not all personal attacks do get zapped though. What about the ones that insinuate things about a posters sex life like on this thread and then when person questions it - get told "stop it, no-one asked?" and that they're imagining things - so it definitely seems OK for that to be allowed to happen.

Report it yourself and find out why?

I will say this again as it is somehow still unclear.

1. Criticising someone’s arguments is not a personal attack.
2. Asking people to keep their personal sexual preferences to themselves is not a personal attack.
3. Telling people to not bringing their genitalia into discussions is not a personal attack.
4. Questioning a link leading to something fundamentally different than purported is not a personal attack.
5. Disagreeing with someone about what is age appropriate is not a personal attack.

However, it appears to have been a personal attack above. I am happy that it was deleted. Personal attacks should not be a part of any discussions.

1. Criticising someone’s arguments is not a personal attack
Nobody's said otherwise.

2. Asking people to keep their personal sexual preferences to themselves is not a personal attack
3. Telling people to not bringing their genitalia into discussions is not a personal attack.

See - this - when someone is speculating about you personally, and what you do or don't do with your own genitalia - how is it them the one bringing it up?! Are they just supposed to let it slide and not put right, and pretend that people aren't doing such a thing?

4. Questioning a link leading to something fundamentally different than purported is not a personal attack
OK, not sure what this is referring to, but fair enough

5. Disagreeing with someone about what is age appropriate is not a personal attack
Nobody said otherwise

Testing, testing, something is up with this thread. Has it been zzapped?

Another test - why can't we open the last page, what's going on

Do we need to get this to the next page?

Good plan.

Worth a try lol

Like, weird...

Bumping it to next page that is, might work

I have it set to 25 posts a page, so 40 pages. You people?

For me this thread is fine until page 32. It's page 33 that's the problem