MiladyRenata:
We think like women
We feel like women
We act like women
We dress like women
Our biology is "wrong", but we had no say in that. So why exclude us?
That is interesting and seems heartfelt.
There is a useful manner of speaking, ‘We think …,’ which may be appropriate:
We think we think like women
We think we feel like women
We think we act like women
We think we dress like women
-- Likewise, ‘We think our biology is “wrong”, but we had no say in that. So why exclude us?’
Indeed, it may not be your fault. For some of you, it may be very sad that you think that. The solution – to avoid such sadness – is not to emphasise what it is you think you are; rather it lies in making explicit what may be implied in this particular way of speaking but is often left tacit, as follows:
We think we think like women … but we are mistaken
We think we feel like women … but we are mistaken
We think we act like women … but we are mistaken
We think we dress like women … but we are mistaken
– And, very importantly, ‘We think our biology is wrong, but we are mistaken’.
Why is this latter important? Because the mistake is there so easy to see: it is just not possible for biology to be wrong (which is why ‘wrong’ was originally scare-quoted, of course). This being so, appreciating its truth is a simple matter … thus aiding clarification of the other mistaken thoughts and hence to seeing they are so mistaken.
I wonder, MiladyRenata, if you can consider the possibility that you are mistaken in what you think?