@Frequency - In certain psychological circles, the TA argument is one that is particularly, and peculiarly, charged with unconscious elements of the psyche - and it seems to be shared collectively. And it seems to spread. Jung would probably have referred to it as a 'collective complex' - a complex being an unconscious constellation of behaviours that appear to act autonomously (that 'drive' the subject, rather that the subject being in conscious control of them). So the engine behind the kind of thinking that Yaniv seems to have - ie the energy that it takes to power Yaniv's thought processes and arguments - is largely unconscious.
To try and comprehend it is to take a dive into the unconscious - because there is little that is rational or reasonable about it, imo.