Apologies for a bit of a fly-by 'drop and run' link, as I'm a bit busy right now.
But I saw this thread andIi got a flashback to last year.
Some newer FWR people may think this thread is a bit harsh.
Poor Aimee. Maybe there was a hack? Maybe Aimee's furrie/child sexual fantasy friends are just also misunderstood/hacked/attacked people? Aimee's trans status means people attack Aimee?
There are a lot of people on FWR who've been here a while.
Who will have seen this last year:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3345977-Furries
The linked thread's wording will look a bit odd, as it was at at time when we were even more heavily policed on this board than right now (I know, right!?)!
As I said last year;
there's a concerning theme of blurred lines between sex, 'furries' and infantilism, a blurred line between children's cartoons and sex, just a hundred blurred lines.
If I recall 'feefers' scrubbed a lot of their social media in response, but a very recent scroll of their twitter shows that they just can't stay away from what they like.
twitter.com/Feefers Have a look. All looks 'OK' ?
These men influence Aimee. Aimee has identified as both a furrie and an adult baby since a mid-teen.
Aimee had a dysfunctional childhood. People like Aimee should be counselled, supported to recover from such a childhood.
Not, instead, for every political party to welcome them in, regardless, without understanding their personal trauma means they are directl linked to Nathaniel Knight, nekosene, and feefers under the 'trans' umbrella