Some musings from my recent involvement with the Freedom Programme.
The Freedom programme teaches that when men control women through dominating behaviour, this comes about not from them being triggered by outside factors (stress, provocation etc) but because of their beliefs. These beliefs are generally about the place of men and women in society and the rights that they believe men have over women. It's highly unlikely that the Dominator's behaviour will change because his beliefs are unlikely to change.
Any apparent changes in his behaviour are generally just a tactic - a woman tires of the behaviour, so either leaves or threatens to leave, the Dominator may then change his behaviour as a temporary measure to draw the woman back. This then re-establishes the "rules of the game" which are based on his beliefs, so the change in behaviour is only temporary. Why would his behaviour change permanently when
A- it's based on his beliefs which he thinks are right
B- you've proved you'll tolerate the behaviour by coming back?
You can probably see where I'm going with this.
If a man cross dresses or believes he has a female gender identity or is AGP, these are the beliefs that cause his abusive behaviour (lying, secrecy, cross dressing AGP sexual abuse).
These beliefs are also based around women and men's role in society- he'd rather play what he believes to be the women's role.
He believes he has a need and a right to do this.
When we are still in these relationships we spend a lot of time wondering, "will he stop"?
But he will never stop as long as his behaviour aligns with his beliefs. Any cessation is a temporary tactic to get us back into our role as wife or facilitator or prop, or beard.
So my conclusion is that "will he stop?" is always the wrong question. The right question is always "Is this how I want to spend my life?". If it is then fair enough. If it isn't you're really only likely to change your own life by leaving and staying away for good.
I'd be interested to know if this rings any bells for women here?