Oh dear, the boys and girls of MN seems a tad agitated....
A man, in other words. In what way do you think women 'navigate society' differently from men? Apart from using different sex-segregated spaces (which no man, however he identifies, should be using).
Yeah pretty much only the sex segregated differences thing, which is relevant a handful of times a year..... and the law is entirely different to your 'opinion'
*transtrendy so you’re female gender, and a man and he / him pronouns are a ok?
So you’ll not get cross when we correctly sex you if we talk about you?*
you can do whatever you want Sir, the day I care about GC's deadnaming or misgendering is the day that.... well..... it simply isnt going to happen is it.... you keep on...whatevs, too funny!
Trans women are male, by definition.
I said that earlier genius, a trans woman a term widely recognised, as you just did, is someone male at birth.... cool..... so we both agree on male at birth and the use of the term woman!
I knew I could make friends in here!
As someone with a background in archaeology I cannot get onboard with the idea sex is merely assigned at birth.
It is woven into your DNA and identifiable thousands of years later.
I have no objections to people choosing to identify and live as another gender but your sex is going nowhere. It will be identified millenniums later after almost every other identifying feature about you had disintegrated.
Yeah nobody cares about any of this, definitely not trans women, do you not think it weird the depths of ridiculousness of some of these arguments you have to use?
We aren't. We know transwomen exist. We're perfectly happy with transwoman existing. We know that that they're males - whatever they 'navigate socially as'. Some are 'feminine', many others 'navigate' pretty much exactly as any other male with male socialisation does.
We understand biology, socialisation, structural sexism. We know what feminism is and who it's for. It's for women and girls. Females.
Yeah just word salads hun, doesnt change the laws of the fact that time and again survey after survey, (except a couple that GC's paid for and manipulated.) shows the majority of women support trans inclusion.... you can chuck as many strawmans at that figure if you like, and repeat the mantra 'the tide is turning' all you like..... you currently have 99% of wider society boycotted, like tantrum throwing children!
Sanluca nice copy & paste job you did from Kiwi Farms, bravo...
*if somebody bumps into me I get apologised to
Apologised to
Because you are a man.*
what a wonderful sane and reasonable response...... because no-one has everbeen apologised to for a man bumping into them inthe history of the universe....okay..... sure..... brillo argument, that told me!
*Being called love isn't an indication of sex. It's an indication of personhood as determined by the speaker.
Women call women, men and children 'love'.
Men call women and children 'love.
Men do not call men 'love (nam obvs, gay men differ on this).*
I know this, I wasnt making any value judgement on the use of it, but nonetheless I get called 'love' by men regularly. So people percieve me in my chosen gender, I'm not even arsed if they think I pass or what my sex is, I am talking about navigating the world by gender, which is what everyone does.
Of course there's other conversations and nuance when sex is relevant, but 99.9999% of my life, it isnt, nor is anyone else's.
Misogyny on the street for example is simply gender based.
You all whinge about Paris Lees talking about being cat-called.... she was cat-called because of her gender.
I wonder if using certain toilets is a way of subconsciously marking territory.
Another one lifted off Kiwi Farms.... it's also a way of having a pee...... such desperate arguments.
Mhairi is fab!!