Potential Systemic Safeguarding failures in NSPCC / Childline illustrated by appointment & ending of relationship with Munroe Bergdorf Thread 2

[R0wantrees]

link to previous thread: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3605120-Munroe-Childline-s-first-LGBT-campaigner

NSPCC statement by CEO Peter Wanless
www.nspcc.org.uk/what-we-do/news-opinion/munroe-bergdorf

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3609218-Hi-from-Safe-Schools-Alliance-UK

AlwaysComingHome and we now know that they'll go straight on to Twitter to snigger about having to be polite to terfs. That NSPCC employee was so sure of the culture there that he posted under his own name. Who the hell would do that when working in child protection, laughing at someone who'd contacted them with a safeguarding concern? The staff in the NSPCC have been groomed to disregard anything women say, on the grounds ds that women are terfs.

Yes, I do think that screenshot James Makings put up in December is a bit strange. Who reported him initially I wonder? And what had he been doing then to get reported? But also, who screenshot that Insta story and why did they do that? Stories are only up for 24 hrs and then disappear, so someone must have been 'onto him' back then?

I just think the whole thing is just fucked up. Hopefully the NSPCC will do the right thing this time.

I couldn't believe that tweet from the NSPCC employee about 'having to be polite to TERFs'. The culture there sounds absolutely toxic. And we know what has been going on at Oxfam and the like. It sounds like it's the same in all these big charities.

Fucking grim.

That person (a man, again, naturally) should have been disciplined for that tweet, and the woman con earned should have had a grovelling apology. But it seems like the penis reign supreme in a lot of organisations.

Not exactly hitting the headlines is it? But a tiny bit of traction here:

I came across this service which may be useful in looking at systemic failures. £84 for a confidential FOI request to the BBC, national lottery or EHCR anyone?
www.foiacentre.com/howwecanhelp.html

BBC always cite artistic freedom or something. Also FOI is free.

Yes, FOI is free. Don't fall for the parasites. You just have to be thoughtful in how you word it but I bet there are plenty of people on here who can help if you start a thread re FOI.

The easiest way to make a FOI request is here:

www.whatdotheyknow.com

You can do it anonymously if you want (just use a pseudonym). As Cismyfatarse says, FOI is free - there's no need to give money to a third party.

No vested interest.

Think labelling as parasite a bit strong, this man set it up and is one of the few to actively follow CSA inquiry.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Watts_(journalist)

FreeFreesia
There's no point in paying someone to do something that you can do very easily for free. Who are you paying? What are they doing for the money?

There's lots of info about making requests here:
www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/requesting

Forgive me if I'm not a fan of Mark Watts of Exaro, who championed 'Nick'.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48265204

Point taken. Not researched enough.

James Makings linked in account has been deleted.

Make of that what you will!

The NSPCC advising on recruitment....

CASPAR NEWS (@NSPCCpro) Tweeted:
How can #schools, colleges and academies recruit safely? The latest NSPCC Learning #podcast discusses the importance of safer #recruitment processes and how you can put them into practice. Listen now t.co/tCrL3n3uGc t.co/xL4VKvoaCQ twitter.com/NSPCCpro/status/1140876911180206080?s=17

The NSPCC advising on recruitment....

Dear goddess.

Shut. Them. Down.

Fionne reminding twatter about Lisa's wise words...

twitter.com/fionneorlander/status/1140709866840961025?s=21

(Hither to named the Oracle, and so it came to pass, etc...)

Spiked Online references the wanking at NSPCC guy. Does not name him.

www.spiked-online.com/2019/06/18/the-trans-ideology-is-harming-kids/

Brendan O'Neill on searing form.

"The NSPCC, as its name suggests, is meant to prevent cruelty to children. And right now, one of the cruellest things being inflicted on children at large is the trans ideology – the eccentric, disorientating notion that you can be ‘born in the wrong body’ and might need drugs and therapy to make you the ‘correct gender’.

"People should worry less about Bergdorf losing a public platform and focus instead on the foisting of the bizarre and destructive ideology of transgenderism on to the next generation".

Wow that is on the point.

I didn't know spiked was that way inclined; I don't know much about it though.,

under 18s “sex playing” online is all ok?

Not according to the 2003 Sexual Offences Act.

(But expect the cyber-police are busy after misgendering mums etc.)

m.youtube.com/watch?v=QvEsEu2pmwg

Rose of Dawn discusses the Penis News coverage of the NSPCC/Makings story.

Rose makes a really good point about how pride appears to conflate kink and being gay and that it's very damaging - and this has also produced the response that criticism of JM is homophobic.

Yeah, why is gay and kink being lumped together?

Yeah, why is gay and kink being lumped together?

Two words: queer theory.

Queer theory splits sexual activity and identity into 2 categories - normative and deviant. Deviant is positive, as queer theory seeks to deconstruct social norms, which are seen as repressive.

Homosexuality falls into the "deviant" category, along with kink. So it is the same kind of thing, to those indoctrinated encouraged to think this way.

And, it's why some straight people are calling themselves "queer" these days.

Why has this not made it into the papers?