cellibabies
I was, indeed.
Partly because:
The mocking tone about comfy pants, getting your yfronts in a twist, hurty feelz etc is really unnecessary actually.
You framing the reaction as unnecessary, rather than totally expected was something I wanted to address. There are very few ways for gender critical feminists to react to the fact that comfy pants were being used as the definition of a woman. As a previous poster said, it's an effort to distract from the normal AGP narrative of fishnets etc.
And
Seriously, what is that achieving? I'd much rather have a genuine question and answer session than rip someone to shreds who doesn't appear to have said anything nasty.
No-one was ripping anyone to shreds. The fact that you think they are suggests one of two things, to me. Either you disagree, fundamentally, with the gender critical position. Or you are new to the discussion. Hence 'teachable moment'.
You may be taking the OP's comments in isolation. I do not. I disagree with the content, and I know exactly why I disagree with the content, which is why the reaction of the women on this thread (including me), is entirely rational and, in my opinion, fairly tame to be honest.
I don't agree with women being told to be a little kinder when they are discussing the erosion of their rights and the erasure of their sex category.