‘More acceptance’ of S&M needed

[Imnobody4]

talkradio.co.uk/news/more-acceptance-needed-sm-activities-19032230392
My morning isn't starting well. Haven't heard the programme - not sure I could stand it.

What rights do you think that other people have that are being denied to you?

Keep a job and not be harassed the minute anyone knows you’re kinky?

That’s a laugh.

Right to practice their sexuality free from inference by the law.

The right to be free from harassment.

The right to keep a job and not be discriminated against due to sexual preference.

But, as I said, it’s fine. Since I’m such a bastard, I’ll just stop what I’m doing shall I? Stop helping the women - I won’t drive 2 hours on a night and extricate a silly wee midden from a dangerous situation, I won’t go with the assault victim to the police, and help make sure, as much as I’m able, that the abusers don’t get next or near any events I’m involved with.

Dead on.

Just as well I shall pay you no heed and keep doing what I’m doing.

Why are you talking about being kinky at work?

Right to practice their sexuality free from inference by the law.

You can do this you just can't break the law. How is this so difficult to grasp? Do you think that no laws should apply when it comes to sex?

I don’t. But do you honestly think if anyone thought I was I’d keep my job?

Why can’t you answer any of my other points?

The right to be free from harassment.

You absolutely do have this right. No one is allowed to harass you.
Someone disagreeing with you isn't harassment.

I don’t break the law. I’ve alreasy made that clear. I know exactly where the boundaries of the law sit - better than most, I’ve done the research.

Oh you thought I meant you? No. I meant in real life.

Ffs

Nobody needs to come out as kinky or any other sexual preferences because sex is private.

However relationships are a different matter. If you are lesbian or gay there comes a point you have to step out with a same sex partner and people might go 'oh'.

But do you honestly think if anyone thought I was I’d keep my job?

I have no idea what your job is.
But the same employment laws that protect everyone else would apply to you.

If you weren't being inappropriate at work and you weren't bringing the company into disrepute they couldn't sack you due to a rumour about what you do in the bedroom.

If someone is harassing you you have the exact sale laws to protect you as anyone else.

You know there are reporters and Facebook vigilantes attend open events with cameras and publish photos online and send them to people’s work?

Anyone who needs enhanced DBS or has professional standing would be well advised not to attend an open event forthat reason.

I note you still haven’t answered my points about how much I am doing and how much I do. Your silence speaks volumes.

I don’t break the law. I’ve alreasy made that clear. I know exactly where the boundaries of the law sit - better than most, I’ve done the research.

Well if you're not breaking the law then how exactly do you not have the right to practise your sexuality free from the law??

Crack on.

your silence speaks volumes

Well yes, if you need an enhanced dbs it's probably a good idea not to go to events where people all get together and shag in public.
Hardly the human rights violation of the century

* I won’t drive 2 hours on a night and extricate a silly wee midden from a dangerous situation*

'Silly wee midden'

But obviously there's no victim blaming in the bdsm community. That's for us vanillas.

Where did you get the idea that people shag in public at bdsm themed events?

Most venues for open events, which was what I was referring to, have a no full frontal nudity and no sex rule.

Private events are, of course, different.

Most people have to behave in a certain way outside of work to keep their jobs.

It's not a human rights issue.

I love getting twat faced, but I have to be careful pictures of me being twat faced don't end up on the internet or I'll get fired.

She was a silly wee midden. She posted on fetlife that she wanted a non limits dom to rape her and destroy her fanny. (Exact quote)

That’s not victim blaming, it a comment on how fucking stupid you have to be to want a “no limits Dom” who is going to rape you and destroy your fanny.

And I didn’t call anyone who doesn’t engage in BDSM a vanilla. I don’t like the term, just as, on point of pedantry, I’m not particularly a fan of BDSM as a catch all term either.

Bankofenglandfiver

Consensual non-consent is not consent in my opinion and I won’t and don’t associate with anyone who practises it.
BDSM is not healthy sexuality in my opinion and although I will tolerate it within limits I will not endorse it.

What’s your point?

I love getting twat faced, but I have to be careful pictures of me being twat faced don't end up on the internet or I'll get fired.

Oh, you mean getting drunk. Sorry, I thought you meant something else.

The point would be the point of the thread?!