Oh dear MBright, your post would be funny if it wasn't so lame.
This entire thread is based on lies that the subject of the thread has fed into. It's now been revealed what the tweets actually said, and it wasn't misgendering Susie Green's daughter. It was over allegations of child abuse and mutilation she directed at Susie Green. It's obvious this whole thread has been an exercise in rabble-rousing about scary trans activists, when the reality is that the subject of the police interview made substantially libellous accusations on a public platform.
Doubt you'll read this response to your message above but I'll try anyway:
Caroline Farrow was informed by the Police that she was under investigation for misgendering Susie Green's child - did you get that, Caroline was repeating what the POLICE had told her she was being investigated for.
The tweets were produced by Susie Green on a television programme, this was the first time Caroline Farrow knew which tweets were the subject of investigation.
The tweets contained factual content and opinion based on the facts. Caroline Farrow is entitled to hold and express an opinion on those facts. The facts were put in the public domain by Susie Green.
Libel is a civil offence not a criminal offence therefore if that is the allegation it should never have been referred to the Police by Susie Green.
Finally, if you had bothered to actually read the thread you would have known that the tweets have been discussed extensively.