Julia Long asking Munro Bergdorf about child exploitation

[happydappy2]

Julia Long was asked to leave the venue, after asking MB if it was normal that an 11yr old child dancing in front of adults, has money thrown at them by grown men. This was at Transmission & was deemed an offensive question....video footage on twitter of the incident.....worth a watch, sorry I can’t link to it but hope someone else can.

[Edited by MNHQ to add video link]

Here is Desmond posing with a naked man, here is Desmond sitting next to a convicted murderer in front of a poster that says Rohypnol.

How can a child be openly gay, which is about sexual orientation, if he is not sexualised. How can a kindergarten child be sexualised if not by grooming?

He's been groomed by his parents. Shocking.

Sorry, The first pic is queen Lactatia, another exploited child.

Normalising the sexualising of children is antithetical to safeguarding, a sign of very poor parenting and supports the aims of paedophilia.

This is correct.

That video was fucking chilling, I actually found that really upsetting to watch: the booing at the question, the absolute BOLLOCKS about 'safe spaces', the way that it was glossed over, and actually the way that Julia Long spoke up made me feel quite emotional as well.

This is condoning child exploitation and abuse. Desmond is an autistic 11 year old boy: if there wasn't LGBTQTIA and a rainbow involved in this, there is no fucking way that anyone would say that it was ok for an 11 year old child to dance in an adult nightclub for money, hang out with murderers, pose next to naked men (that is Lactatia I know) or feature on an Etsy page for fetish gear (both Desmond and Lactatia).

How the fucking fuck can this be allowed to happen?

And I can only assume that the 'if his parents are OK with it, why can't you be' poster, is trolling because no one can be that dim.

‘It's the child's lifestyle choice.'

Interesting concept - my parents made it very clear that I didn’t get to decide on my ‘lifestyle’ until I was under my own roof, with the means to finance my own lifestyle choices.

Bergdorf really does seem completely oblivious about safeguarding kids! It’s all, ‘let kids be themselves’ without any thought as to why women, especially mothers, have concerns about this stuff

What concerns me is that it wasn't just MB. Of course they are not seeing the damage to anyone else, they are 100% ego. The crowd seemed to be encouraging the abuse of a child, too.

Sabrewolf’s orger thread has been deleted- she is a troll.

*other

What a shame. It was such fun.

What was the other thread?

How the fucking fuck can this be allowed to happen?

Dodgy people in power.

If an 11 year old child has sex because 'they have chosen to, it's part of them being themselves', presumably Munroe and their ilk wouldn't have a problem with it, following their logic?

Sabre been identified as a 'prolific and tedious troll' by HQ.

So a seasoned campaigner, who is determined to allow a 11-year-old boy be groomed and sexually exploited.

Fucking bastards.

Peter Tatchell wouldn't have a problem with it.

Sabre been identified as a 'prolific and tedious troll' by HQ.

And the rest of us reduced to using code words such as Bunbury and apparently to try to signal the obvious to everyone else. Sigh.

'Napoles’s parents stated that he was “openly gay” when he entered kindergarten.'

Fucking weirdos. That's so fetishistic and sick, like he's their little gay dolly they like to dress up Properly disturbing

How old are kids at kindergarten? Two or three? How can you be 'openly gay'? You're touching other children in a sexual way?

Yes, it must be the same as when 2 year olds apparently casually ask their parents when they can get their penis cut off and be turned into a girl.

But the parents have had no influence at all of course....

'How can you be 'openly gay'? "

The fucking idiots probably mean that he liked pink and sparkly stuff and dollies etc. None of which has a GODDAMN THING to do with being gay, at any age. Sorry for shouting, just absolutely disgusted by this story. It gets worse the more you read.

A child too young for sexual attraction to have developed is too young to have any orientation. Myself and among friends who are gay, I know no one who knew younger than about eight or nine, and the majority were around ten. This is why children like poor Jazz Jennings, who had puberty blockers, have reached adulthood incapable of sexual feelings or sexual orientation, that part of their brain and body didn't reach the point of maturity necessary.

Sexualised behaviour in young children is learned, and doesn't reflect their sexual orientation or preference, it reflects what they've learned through survival behaviours from the situation adults put them in.

I see from the deletion notice on the thread Sabre started that the person trying to down play and excuse the way this poor child is being exploited has turned out to be a prolific and persistent troll that MNHQ have banned before.

Good for Julia Long. A woman of integrity.

It is PIE isn't it.
Why is Desmond falling outside the safeguarding framework? Just how scared have child services become of the gender lobby that they fail to intervene?
How is it that this is happening openly and being framed as affirmative action when it is clearly grooming, exploitation and sexualising a young child?
Child protection should be all over this but they seem content to let Desmond stay with adults who are acting out their sick fetishes upon a vulnerable child. It's so fucking disturbing.

Knicknack
Sexualised behaviour in young children is learned, and doesn't reflect their sexual orientation or preference, it reflects what they've learned through survival behaviours from the situation adults put them in.
Precisely. It's behaviour that they learn is rewarded with what they believe is 'love' and attention.