Its worth listening to the radio interview by PP and the reasons why she describes herself as a woman's rights activist rather than a feminist activist.
I find the notion that she has to a) say she is feminist b) in doing so fit within existing media feminist hierarchies and frameworks and thinking c) therefore all actions have to be assessed on basis of threat to the left, fucking bizarre.
Whatever I might think why on earth should Posie say she holds with a way of htinking the people demanding her denouncement are asking for? Its not just about the fact that right wing women are women its that appointing yourself the conduit women have to use to discuss inequality is fucking batshit and was only allowed by media.
Am really sorry but there are God complexes going on here. No Posie does not have to call herself a feminist to act for herself, to act for women how she sees fit, no she does not hve to ask permission from a bunch of women who appear to have managed to get a very cushy and lengthy good deal identifying as a feminist while womens rights are being decimated and dont seem to have noticed, and no woman has to ask permission of the elite feminists screaming to discuss inequality.
Is this why not a peep was heard with austerity? Oh yes it was. Becayuse the left and feminists said we were not allowed to discuss it without reference to them., Noone ever explained y what authority, something to do with being posh, having mates at the Guardian, and that was it.
Am sorry but its disgusting and the tribalism on show is telling wome a great deal and its informative about how htings have been, but its nothing to do with anything useful for anyone and never has been.