Lesbians react to London Pride

[garam]

Some very passionate responses from the lesbian community, since the anti-trans protests.

When Jennifer James pushed to sue the labour party, the result was the labour party clarified it's position as self-id for AWS

This has a similar ring to it, as the anti-trans protesters tried to co-opt the lesbian community, there has been a vocal backlash and clarification of support for trans people.

There's a hashtag to check out... twitter.com/hashtag/LWithTheT?src=hash

@littlebrowndog
They saw a sign saying " Beware of the dog"
and they can't fit you into their big box of labels.

So we have one gay serial killer vs how many examples of lesbian women being told they have to suck cock?

pratchet

Ive said it before and I'll say it again

When certain posters say lesbian...ive no fucking idea what they mean

When certain posters say women...I've no fucking idea what they mean

When certain posters say born female .....ive no fucking idea what they mean

If certain posters said my eyes were blue...i would have to check the mirror

How do we know? They're still posting

Lols so patronising. Bigly

rufus

WORD

Oops that to the daims. Trotting off feeling superior

Lols crusty no stuffing me in a wee box

So to be clear the only one the daims wants to have the chit chat wit is datun cos the rest of us is dull feckers.

Well yes majesty. Notably the lisa Muggeridge op and thread that linked to 'banned' material if a feminist nature was deleted. This Op linking to 'banned' material of a transactivist nature is allowed to stay up.

I know, trying to get datun banned and deleted.

I've got no strikes, so it's not very effective.

Fortunately, the more people ramp up the goadiness, the more they expose themselves.

Think youre right little

Do we think Bespin was drafted in for damage control but thought "Shit, we're fucked. I've got nothing" ?

This thread is full of lesbophobia and rape culture. I think leaving it up is a sign that FWR WILL disappear, so we must make the most of it while we can.

Most people on this website, when steadfastly arguing a point, and someone gives a personal example of an experience that went against what I was saying, say, for example, something that was very personal, perhaps upsetting for that person, to explain coercive control.

Or someone else posted a story of violence against another for refusing sex.

Most people, even if they still held fast to their point,would normally acknowledge the other's experience, acknowledge that it must have been upsetting or harmful.

Most people would not just completely ignore the posts and pretend they never happened.

My red flag bunting from this is now hung up not only in my house, but round the garden and down the street!

Haven't rtft but have to jump in & repeat this absolute peach👌

Frankly daimbars, I couldn’t give one shiney shit if your pearl clutching corporate schmoozing rape culture supporting pride marchers are shocked and appalled. Good I say, they damn well should be shocked . I’m shocked that lesbians are being told to accept cock and this is being touted as super woke and progressive.

Who said it?!

Oi oi daim why u target Datun.

The lessers not good enough for u.

Oh fuck me, I'm going to die laughing.

I love you, Dog.

(That wasn't a general invitation to fuck me, by the way. I'm picky. I do like penis but it has to be a good one. Too much? I'll see myself out. MNHQ - PLEASE DON'T SMITE ME. I CAN'T HELP IT. DOG MADE ME LAUGH AND I WENT A BIT FUNNY.)

I cannot let that be the last post before the thread says goodnight

lang

oi oi

S'alright Lang, we'll put it down to the heat. Pratchet's funny turn today caused her to change names, so a small 'fuck me...no, don't fuck me literally' is excusable.

I now have mimmymam logged as mine all mine don't I ? In case I need to pull the emergency cord again ?

That probably isn't a good post to end on either, is it!

So I'm going to highlight something that got lost on the last thread.

Why is it OK for Pink News' reporter to spot two 'people' on the sidelines of Pride, and describe them as 'transgender' before even going up to them? (At 40 mins into their reportage).

A) Well that doesn't seem right, given all we're told about how harmful it is to highlight someone's trans status, and how dangerous it is to do so.

B) How did they know? Hmm.

That was - and still is - a very good question Pom

How did PN know they were trans, indeed. Chinny reckon, eh.