Women in situtions of vulnerability should not be coerced to put their feelings, needs and history in a box so they can nurture the feelings, needs and history of the person who has been employed to provide a service to them. Anyone working in that field for the right reasons would get this. It's like the twat who fought through the courts for years for the right to counsel raped women who did not want to be counselled by him: his right to access those women and be allowed to overcome that boundary trumped any professional interest or care he had for his potential clients.
This view was attacked by trans campaigner Sarah Brown, who said it “punishes vulnerable trans women for hypothetical acts of infiltration by men claiming to be trans women”.
Sarah Brown would be much happier if vulnerable women just shut up and took the punishment of assaults and abuse if those hypothetical acts by men claiming to be TIMs. Here's a radical idea Sarah: how about a third option where no one's 'punished' or a victim to male violence at all, instead of arguing who has to get the shitty end of the stick?