Lancelottie JAPAB, you're male, as far as I recall.
Trust me, you do NOT understand the level of ingrained wariness about what might happen, for real, very commonly, if you cross someone shouting hate and threats at you.
That is not the sole preserve of females is it? Males of various stripes - certain religions, sexualities, races, or those who are in opposition to these groups and their rights - will have had this.
But irrespective of who does or doesn't have an "insight" into the wariness that comes with being in an ideological or other group that can be loathed by some others, there are objective statistical elements here. But it is a free country. People are free to carry on having chest pains and anxiety attacks over perceived threats that the statistics tell us are rare almost to the point of non-existence. Bit of a shame though IMO.
PencilsInSpace No because on the whole women have been terrified into silence.
"On the whole" is this even on the radar for most women? That is quite the speculation. That there is a terrified majority and if they were to start joining in protests and so on, then the amount of incidents like the one at Hyde Park would skyrocket.
Why don't you tell all these people that it's just words on a screen?
I wouldn't say "just" as that is trivialising. I might however point out that outside of those words on the screen very little seems to be happening, if someone was to report chest pains and anxiety issues, as I'd find it a shame that they are letting it affect them into a state that is disproprtionate to the physical risk.