Dismissing this as the equivalent of Britain First is comfortable, but Britain First are not consulting with the government in creating legislation, or being validated by them. This group were consulted with and contributed to Maria Miller's report on which the legislation about to be waved through is based.
After the event at Speakers Corner last week where four transactivists from the group including this organisation, beat up a woman, the same group of transactivists organised a contact of all LGBT organisations to prevent them making a statement or speaking out against the violence, or making criticism of what the TAs did at that event. It worked. Only Stonewall has spoken out against it, and even then it's not separated itself from the people at that event or their actions. These are not fringe views rejected by the minority.
If Britain First or the EDL announced an open policy of no debate allowed, being 'radically and transformatively violent' against women while wearing t shirts representing bloodstains and 'punch a (whatever- woman? muslim? immigrant? refugee? LGBT person? bank manager?), and actively organising to shut down any event they felt made them 'unsafe' by intimidating, stalking, harrassing and threatening, the national papers would be all over it. They would be shamed and vilified, not excused.