I’ve had a response to my letter to Justine Greening.
It doesn’t address any of my points and only makes a tiny reference to not destroying women’s rights by saying:
“This should not mean that there is a hierarchy of equality”
Lots about children, which seems worrying.
Dear Quarks,
Thank you for your email of 2nd October to Justine Greening. I have been asked to respond on her behalf.
In the Government response to the Women and Equalities Select Committee report into transgender equality, we committed to reviewing the Gender Recognition Act in order to de-medicalise and streamline it.
We have completed an initial internal review and we are convinced of the need to reform the Act. We are now committing to publish a formal, government consultation document later in 2017.
Attaining quick, accessible and transparent legal gender recognition helps transgender people live more comfortably and free from stigma and discrimination. This should not mean that there is a hierarchy of equality: we want all people to be safe, healthy and happy, irrespective of their gender identity.
We will consult widely on the detail of proposals to change legislation and this will include with women’s groups.
Many trans people find the current focus on medical checks in the gender recognition process very intrusive and stigmatising. That is why we are moving to a system that works better for trans people. In line with our commitment, we will streamline and de-medicalise the Gender Recognition Act.
As a person’s gender has important legal and social consequences, we will consider carefully the impact of self-declaration in our policy development and we will consult widely on proposals to reduce medical evidence requirements.
It is important that all children are supported, including those who identify as transgender or who are gender-questioning.
Children at any age may not conform to their gender stereotype. It is only in working with gender identity services that a diagnosis of gender dysphoria be given. Trained professionals will help families to make decisions regarding the timing and process of any gender role changes for their young children.
Each case should be judged on the basis of its individual circumstances. It is for parents to explore and make decisions with their children and school, and with other services, as appropriate.
Thank you again for your email, and I hope this response addresses your concerns.
Yours sincerely
Government Equalities Office