I have read the whole thread (scanned a few bits) but I couldn't resist pointing out to you your behaviour on this thread. The first half or three quarters of this thread are you dominating other posters, and when they stand up for themselves, you dismiss or belittle them (or both). I actually wondered for a while if you were doing it as a deliberate clever way of demonstrating what it is like to be dominated/belittled by men!
To the same end, you were rattling off inaccurately presented psychology theory and research to gain a superior position to the other posters. Maybe you should reflect on why you needed to do that?
I am a psychologist, working specifically with forensic populations and I'm not sold on your declaration of how you 'fix' the young people you work with either to be frank.
If you want me to prattle on about how psychology would explain catcalls, I'll give it a whirl, but what really struck me was your attitude and approach!
Anactualpsychologist
I'm going to take you at your word, because I have no reason to doubt your credentials, despite the interesting conversation one could have with a psychologist who names her/him self as anactualpsychologist in a chatroom.
Please see highlighted points above as I address them...
You are not the behaviour police, you don't need to point anything out, I know exactly how I behave.
I do not dominate anyone, I use stats and evidence to make claims, and discuss innacuracies of others argument. There is no power or influence here.
Please cite where I have belittled anyone! Unlike you, and others I don't go after people, I comment on posts, and innacuracies.
Please correct me on my innacuracies, I suspect if there were many innacuracies you would have cited them.
Where have I said I fix anyone? I am searching out a fix for a problem, and am involved with helping people. Infact in your field, I would think you would be more empathetic to my stance, working with criminal mental illness, and determing causal factors etc.
Prattle on? You sound very passionate about what you do!
To sum up, I don't think you've read the content of my posts, and merely have been engrossed in the debate, and dislike for how I have put my case forward. That highlights to me that your emotion has trumped your reason, which could be an issue in your field don't you think.
I've said it plenty, ignore who I am, how I sound, and leave the emotion at the door, deal with me in facts, evidence, and reason, and I will have no recourse but to change my mind.