I think I might start feeling like a dog and I'll cock my leg and piss up trees in public because I really feel deep down that I am a Golden Retriever born in the wrong body.
There could be all sorts of fun with this idea of defining as what you like without having to take any steps to show that you are actually making a very real attempt to physically transition to the thing you say you are. It would be hilarious if it were not so frightening.
In the case of Claire, Claire should have been described in court and in the media as a man who goes by the self given name of Claire and chooses to live as a woman, but as that won't appease the bleeding hearts and assumes that we even need or deserve an explanation of Claire's gender identity perhaps we should just start referring to people like Claire as a 'person'. Maybe that should be the law and the most you are entitled to demand unless and until you have had gender reassignment surgery.
So the accepted norm would be that we use sex neutral and gender neutral descriptors and the article linked could read as follows:
Adult Offspring found guilty of murdering father with MS
A carer who said they suffocated their father with a plastic bag because of his "intolerable" multiple sclerosis has been found guilty of murder.
The person who calls themselves Claire Darbyshire, 36, said they killed their father Brian, 67, at their home in Wykeham Green, Dagenham, on 2 September 2015 as part of a failed suicide pact.
The person was found the next evening wandering around clifftops in Kent, asking for help.
The Old Bailey jury unanimously found the person guilty. They had denied murder.
Mr Darbyshire, a father of two, had developed MS in 1995 and lost his wife Lynn in 2008.
His adult offspring had become his full-time carer when he became bed-ridden in 2014.
Prosecutor Jonathan Rees QC said the person who calls themselves Ms Darbyshire had come to an "agreement" with their father that they would kill themselves; because of his condition and because they would have nothing to live for once their father had gone".
However, jurors heard that Mr Darbyshire had never expressed suicidal thoughts or complained about being in pain to nurses who visited him.
Mr Rees said a woman who worked in a jewellery shop where the person calling themselves Ms Darbyshire volunteered had also noticed they was "more and more stressed" and complained about having to look after their father.
After killing him the person took a train to Dover. They were found the next day on the White Cliffs by a National Trust worker.
Mr Darbyshire's body was discovered by police on 10 September, eight days after the killing, after a neighbour raised the alarm.
Police found him in bed dressed in a suit, with a teddy bear and several notes written by his adult offsrping which praised him as a "wonderful" man and said: "He asked me to help him end it".
White Cliffs of DoverImage copyrightReuters
Image caption
The person calling themselves Ms Darbyshire was found wandering along the White Cliffs by a National Trust worker
In a statement to police, the person said their father had "got to the stage where he couldn't stand the misery of his life and the indignity of it any more".
However, Scotland Yard said the person never mentioned their father's death or the suicide pact until five days later.
Paul Keleher, the person's defence lawyer, had argued that the person's actions amounted to assisting suicide rather than committing an unlawful killing.
However, the jury rejected the lesser offences of manslaughter or assisting a suicide.
THIS STATEMENT OF EXPLANATION BELOW WOULD BECOME UNNECESSARY AND REDUNDANT.
Ms Darbyshire was born Christopher, but changed her name to Claire by deed poll in 2008 and has lived as a woman for many years.
Nothing in the wording of that article could be argued with. Nothing insists or implies that Claire is a man. It just refuses to accept or acknowledge Claire's insistence that Claire is a woman, while Claire still has a penis and male levels of testosterone coursing through Claire's body.
As for 'cis woman' it's not an actual thing it's merely a ideological concept. You can call me a 'cis woman' all you like but I will dismiss it as nothing more than your crank ideology, which is to try to redefine sex beyond a matter of basic biology.
'Cis woman' isn't what I am and it never will be. It's what you want me to be, what you wish I were in order to justify what you say you are. That isn't my ideology, it's just a cold hard fact.
If you need a prefix to define what you are, and how you feel inside in a way that other people can understand, that's fine, crack on, but leave my biological sex and gender identity out of it, thanks. I won't redefine my actual, physical, biological, sexually reproductive self to support someone else's minority view that being a woman is all in the head and reproductive organs and genitalia are irrelevant.