Just a bit of a question not a judgement about the boards

[FallenThroughTheRabitHole]

I tend to go between various topics to see what others are saying. If I'm being honest the large part of my time here is spent in either Chat, AIBU or Relationships. I know those topics aren't a representation of MNet as a whole but you go where you go nonetheless.
I was just wondering if anyone had come across responses to various threads in which they thought "What on earth!?"

On the relationships board I've often found the 'Tell it like it is' clan, who often, if not always, have nothing better to offer than variations of 'LTB' are rife and are never actually helpful in way of advice or support.

Chat is normally relaxed... and AIBU is usually set up for a flaming of sorts. This is the internet after all so no-one should be losing sleep but I've always wondered how this would appear from a feminist perspective - The advice we are offering each other here.

I'm not complaining about these boards as I've often found a lot of supportive advice but one comment that hit me was someone saying that they couldn't believe the amount of ingrained misogyny on various threads.

What is it with the cross-examination? Don't you have anything better to do than look for double meanings?

I simply made a common-sense point.

I see that, because it doesn't fit with the orthodoxy on this thread, you will attack until you've made me feel bad!

It was a random comment, aimed, seriously, at the ether.

You have chosen not to believe me.

I have chosen not to believe that you don't believe me.

You have chosen to demand a response.

I have chosen to give you a response merited by your demands for a response.

You have taken offense. I am going to bed.

I'm looking for any meaning. What error for example have I apparently ,according to you , admitted?

ActuallyBlistory" I haven't taken offence I'm utterly bemused by you and Jeanne. And mystified by what error Jeanne thinks I've admitted to.

I feel very upset by this cross-examination.

I don't know how else to explain to you. You misunderstood blistory's point, as is now obvious. But there is no need to interrogate me for something that is between you and another poster!

Oh, 'mystified'.

This same exclusionary, pseudo-academic language - what does this even mean, to normal people?!

Don't you see how you will be making everyone reading think that your point is only accessible to a tiny number of the in-group?

I'm not mystified. I'm Blistory. Does any of that help ?

I haven't read all of this thread. It keeps making me feel squirmy, and I want to be zzzzzzzen so I can sleep at night for a change. But, as a result of my dipping around the posts, I feel a tremendous urge to scatter hearts & flowers like fluffy confetti, particularly over Blistory and Jeanne for persistent humour at the coalface.

Here, have some ??? ???

If I may respond to one of the OP's early remarks: "just saying blunt comments doesn't help", I should like to point out that, actually, it does. It's worked remarkably well for men over time, and I believe it a demonstrable fact that it works for women too. HTH.

Jeanne I never said anything about exclusionary, pseudo intellectual etc, etc. If you want to be insulting at least make your insults accurate.

It was in your terminology, lass.

But, clearly, you are going to have a go at me whatever I say, and you'll nit-pick trivial points instead of admitting I might be right.

I'm off, I think. Enough of this petty disingenousness.

The whole pseudo was long before I even posted. What "terminology"?

And as for your last post, pot, kettle and black spring to mind.